From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Cc: eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
pbonzini@redhat.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
christoffer.dall@linaro.org, drjones@redhat.com, wei@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] VFIO: platform: Introduce direct EOI interrupt handler
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 12:20:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170531122039.0b41d5b7@w520.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1495656803-28011-3-git-send-email-eric.auger@redhat.com>
On Wed, 24 May 2017 22:13:15 +0200
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> wrote:
> We add two new fields in vfio_platform_irq: deoi and handler.
>
> If deoi is set, this means the physical IRQ attached to the virtual
> IRQ is directly deactivated by the guest and the VFIO driver does
> not need to disable the physical IRQ and mask it at VFIO level.
>
> The handler pointer points to either the automasked or "deoi" handler.
> This latter is the same as the one used for edge sensitive IRQs.
> A wrapper handler is introduced that calls the chosen handler function.
>
> The irq lock is taken/released in the wrapper handler. eventfd_signal
> can be called in regions not allowed to sleep.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>
> ---
> ---
> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c
> index 831f0b0..2f82459 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c
> @@ -148,11 +148,8 @@ static int vfio_platform_set_irq_unmask(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> static irqreturn_t vfio_automasked_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> {
> struct vfio_platform_irq *irq_ctx = dev_id;
> - unsigned long flags;
> int ret = IRQ_NONE;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_ctx->lock, flags);
> -
> if (!irq_ctx->masked && !irq_ctx->automasked) {
> ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
>
> @@ -161,8 +158,6 @@ static irqreturn_t vfio_automasked_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> irq_ctx->automasked = true;
> }
>
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_ctx->lock, flags);
> -
> if (ret == IRQ_HANDLED)
> eventfd_signal(irq_ctx->trigger, 1);
>
> @@ -178,6 +173,19 @@ static irqreturn_t vfio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> +static irqreturn_t vfio_wrapper_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct vfio_platform_irq *irq_ctx = dev_id;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + irqreturn_t ret;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_ctx->lock, flags);
> + ret = irq_ctx->handler(irq, dev_id);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_ctx->lock, flags);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int vfio_set_trigger(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev, int index,
> int fd, irq_handler_t handler)
> {
> @@ -208,9 +216,10 @@ static int vfio_set_trigger(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev, int index,
> }
>
> irq->trigger = trigger;
> + irq->handler = handler;
>
> irq_set_status_flags(irq->hwirq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
> - ret = request_irq(irq->hwirq, handler, 0, irq->name, irq);
> + ret = request_irq(irq->hwirq, vfio_wrapper_handler, 0, irq->name, irq);
Noting here that vfio-platform already requests an exclusive interrupt
(flags = 0), which I think is something that's going to need work for
vfio-pci since we'll request a shared interrupt by default if the
device supports DisINTx masking. If we're doing this special trick at
the GIC, we'll starve other devices if they share an interrupt.
> if (ret) {
> kfree(irq->name);
> eventfd_ctx_put(trigger);
> @@ -232,7 +241,8 @@ static int vfio_platform_set_irq_trigger(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> struct vfio_platform_irq *irq = &vdev->irqs[index];
> irq_handler_t handler;
>
> - if (vdev->irqs[index].flags & VFIO_IRQ_INFO_AUTOMASKED)
> + if (vdev->irqs[index].flags & VFIO_IRQ_INFO_AUTOMASKED &&
> + !irq->deoi)
nit, strange linewrap
> handler = vfio_automasked_irq_handler;
> else
> handler = vfio_irq_handler;
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h
> index 8a3cfa9..b80a380 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ struct vfio_platform_irq {
> spinlock_t lock;
> struct virqfd *unmask;
> struct virqfd *mask;
> + bool deoi;
> + irqreturn_t (*handler)(int irq, void *dev_id);
> };
>
> struct vfio_platform_region {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-31 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-24 20:13 [PATCH 00/10] ARM/ARM64 Direct EOI setup for VFIO wired interrupts Eric Auger
2017-05-24 20:13 ` [PATCH 01/10] vfio: platform: Add automasked field to vfio_platform_irq Eric Auger
2017-05-25 18:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-05-30 12:45 ` Auger Eric
2017-05-31 17:41 ` Alex Williamson
2017-05-24 20:13 ` [PATCH 02/10] VFIO: platform: Introduce direct EOI interrupt handler Eric Auger
2017-05-31 18:20 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2017-05-24 20:13 ` [PATCH 03/10] VFIO: platform: Direct EOI irq bypass for ARM/ARM64 Eric Auger
2017-05-31 18:20 ` Alex Williamson
2017-05-31 19:31 ` Auger Eric
2017-06-01 10:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-05-24 20:13 ` [PATCH 04/10] VFIO: pci: Add automasked field to vfio_pci_irq_ctx Eric Auger
2017-05-31 18:21 ` Alex Williamson
2017-05-24 20:13 ` [PATCH 05/10] VFIO: pci: Introduce direct EOI INTx interrupt handler Eric Auger
2017-05-31 18:24 ` Alex Williamson
2017-06-01 20:40 ` Auger Eric
2017-06-02 8:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-06-14 8:07 ` Auger Eric
2017-06-14 8:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-05-24 20:13 ` [PATCH 06/10] irqbypass: Add a private field in the producer Eric Auger
2017-05-24 20:13 ` [PATCH 07/10] VFIO: pci: Direct EOI irq bypass for ARM/ARM64 Eric Auger
2017-05-24 20:13 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Handle unshared mapped interrupts Eric Auger
2017-05-25 19:14 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-05-30 12:50 ` Auger Eric
2017-06-02 13:33 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-06-02 14:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-06-02 16:29 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-06-08 8:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-06-08 8:34 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-06-08 8:55 ` Auger Eric
2017-06-08 10:14 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-06-08 8:49 ` Auger Eric
2017-06-08 10:11 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-05-24 20:13 ` [PATCH 09/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Implement forwarding setting Eric Auger
2017-05-25 19:19 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-05-30 12:54 ` Auger Eric
2017-05-30 13:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-05-30 14:03 ` Auger Eric
2017-05-24 20:13 ` [PATCH 10/10] KVM: arm/arm64: register DEOI irq bypass consumer on ARM/ARM64 Eric Auger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170531122039.0b41d5b7@w520.home \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=wei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).