From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751218AbdEaOEZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 May 2017 10:04:25 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:32809 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751041AbdEaOEX (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 May 2017 10:04:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 16:04:17 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Byungchul Park Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lge.com Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API Message-ID: <20170531140414.GA10088@lerouge> References: <1494549935-13972-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> <20170530052920.GJ28017@X58A-UD3R> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170530052920.GJ28017@X58A-UD3R> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 02:29:20PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 09:45:35AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > Although llist provides proper APIs, they are not used. Make them used. > > +to peterz@infradead.org > +to mingo@kernel.org > +to rostedt@goodmis.org > > I am not sure whom should I send this patch to.. > Could you check this if you are right person? I'll take it. Thanks!