From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Okash Khawaja <okash.khawaja@gmail.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@llwyncelyn.cymru>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the tty tree
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 08:50:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170605065003.GG14680@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170605145749.4d6df5cd@canb.auug.org.au>
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 02:57:49PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in:
>
> include/uapi/linux/tty.h
>
> between commit:
>
> 8a8dabf2dd68 ("tty: handle the case where we cannot restore a line discipline")
>
> from the tty tree and commit:
>
> 1ab92da32e37 ("staging: speakup: add tty-based comms functions")
>
> from the staging tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I used the tty tree version) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
I'm the maintainer of both, I knew this would happen and made it so it
was obvious what version to take :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-05 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-05 4:57 linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the tty tree Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-05 6:50 ` Greg KH [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-10-04 6:33 Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-04 8:26 ` Greg KH
2016-02-01 3:51 Stephen Rothwell
2016-02-01 4:01 ` Greg KH
2012-11-29 4:47 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-29 5:17 ` Greg KH
2012-11-28 5:14 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-28 16:47 ` Greg KH
2012-09-17 7:37 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-17 11:20 ` Greg KH
2012-09-13 6:14 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-13 6:59 ` Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-09-13 7:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-07 5:58 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-07 14:48 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170605065003.GG14680@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=alan@llwyncelyn.cymru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=okash.khawaja@gmail.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox