From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751430AbdFEIHP (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2017 04:07:15 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:38653 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751336AbdFEIHO (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2017 04:07:14 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 10:07:13 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Linus Torvalds , Andy Shevchenko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: new tree for linux-next: uuid Message-ID: <20170605080713.GA22028@lst.de> References: <20170604201413.GA12748@lst.de> <20170605094956.069d5af3@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170605094956.069d5af3@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Meh, thanks. This has been throught the buildbot countless times without a report. But I guess a less generic name might be a good idea to start with. Andy: do you think UUID_INIT/GUID_INIT make sense to your? or _INITIALIZER?