From: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com>
To: Fabien Lahoudere <fabien.lahoudere@collabora.co.uk>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>,
Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@collabora.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"open list:USB PHY LAYER" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] usb-phy-generic: Add support to SMSC USB3315
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:43:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170605094330.GA21071@b29397-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1496653020.31741.2.camel@collabora.co.uk>
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 10:57:00AM +0200, Fabien Lahoudere wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 15:00 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 05/26, Fabien Lahoudere wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > I modify ci_hrdc_imx_probe to bypass "data->phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(&pdev->dev,
> > > "fsl,usbphy", 0);". Everything works as expected and call ci_ulpi_init.
> > >
> > > The problem is that in ci_ulpi_init, before calling "ci->ulpi = ulpi_register_interface(ci->dev,
> > > &ci->ulpi_ops);" (to initialize our phy), "hw_phymode_configure(ci);" is called which is the
> > > original function that make our system to hang.
> > >
> > > Our phy is not initialised before calling ulpi_register_interface so I don't understand how the
> > > phy
> > > can reply if it is not out of reset state.
> >
> > I haven't see any problem in hw_phymode_configure(). What's the
> > value of ci->platdata->phy_mode? USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_ULPI? If
> > you phy needs to be taken out of reset to reply to the ulpi reads
> > of the vendor/product ids, then it sounds like you have a similar
> > situation to what I had. I needed to turn on some regulators to
> > get those reads to work, otherwise they would fail, but knowing
> > what needed to be turned on basically meant I needed to probe the
> > ulpi driver so probing the ids wasn't going to be useful. So on
> > my device the reads for the ids go through, but they get all
> > zeroes back, which is actually ok because there aren't any bits
> > set on my devices anyway. After the reads see 0, we fallback to
> > DT matching, which avoids the "bring it out of reset/power it on"
> > sorts of problems entirely.
> >
>
> Yes the phy mode is configured to USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_ULPI.
> Indeed, this phy need to be out of reset to work. For example everything works fine if I call
> "_ci_usb_phy_init(ci);" before calling "hw_phymode_configure(ci);"
> This function only init reset GPIO and clock.
>
> For information, the original patch I have to fix the issue:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> index 79ad8e9..21aaff1 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> @@ -391,6 +391,7 @@ static int ci_usb_phy_init(struct ci_hdrc *ci)
> case USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_UTMI:
> case USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_UTMIW:
> case USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_HSIC:
> + case USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_ULPI:
> ret = _ci_usb_phy_init(ci);
> if (!ret)
> hw_wait_phy_stable();
> @@ -398,7 +399,6 @@ static int ci_usb_phy_init(struct ci_hdrc *ci)
> return ret;
> hw_phymode_configure(ci);
> break;
> - case USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_ULPI:
> case USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SERIAL:
> hw_phymode_configure(ci);
> ret = _ci_usb_phy_init(ci);
> --
Currently, the hw_phymode_configure is called twice for ULPI PHY, the
two execution are between _ci_usb_phy_init, would you test which one
causes hang? If the second causes hang, you can make a patch for
hw_phymode_configure that if the required PORTSC_PTS is the same
the value in register, do noop.
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-05 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-19 6:14 [RFC] usb-phy-generic: Add support to SMSC USB3315 Peter Senna Tschudin
2017-04-19 10:03 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2017-04-19 10:24 ` Peter Senna Tschudin
2017-04-19 17:23 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2017-04-20 8:50 ` Peter Chen
2017-05-23 18:16 ` Fabien Lahoudere
2017-05-23 21:00 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-05-25 10:36 ` Fabien Lahoudere
2017-05-26 9:00 ` Fabien Lahoudere
2017-06-02 22:00 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-05 8:57 ` Fabien Lahoudere
2017-06-05 9:43 ` Peter Chen [this message]
2017-06-05 9:52 ` Fabien Lahoudere
2017-06-06 1:55 ` Peter Chen
2017-06-06 17:36 ` Fabien Lahoudere
2017-06-07 1:43 ` Peter Chen
2017-06-07 15:00 ` Fabien Lahoudere
2017-06-08 12:27 ` Fabien Lahoudere
2017-06-09 8:26 ` Peter Chen
2017-06-09 11:17 ` Fabien Lahoudere
2017-06-12 1:20 ` Peter Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170605094330.GA21071@b29397-desktop \
--to=hzpeterchen@gmail.com \
--cc=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=fabien.lahoudere@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.chen@nxp.com \
--cc=peter.senna@collabora.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox