From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] efi: Avoid fortify checks in EFI stub
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 18:17:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170606171712.GA4483@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_nDZ2yfAQ+CHK3XXiTMp-A0CcFtCaJzErrZDWqbt0AOw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 05:13:07PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> (+ Mark, Matt)
>
> On 6 June 2017 at 04:52, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> > This avoids CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE from being enabled during the EFI stub
> > build, as adding a panic() implementation may not work well. This can be
> > adjusted in the future.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > Cc; Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
> > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
I believe for arm64 the immediate breakage is implicitly fixed by the
<asm/string.h> definition, but I agree it makes sense to be explicit
anyhow.
FWIW:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Kees, as an aside, do you want me to patchify the vdso fixup? Or are
you going to handle that?
Thanks,
Mark.
> > ---
> > drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile
> > index f7425960f6a5..37e24f525162 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ cflags-$(CONFIG_ARM) := $(subst -pg,,$(KBUILD_CFLAGS)) \
> > cflags-$(CONFIG_EFI_ARMSTUB) += -I$(srctree)/scripts/dtc/libfdt
> >
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS := $(cflags-y) -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING \
> > + -D__NO_FORTIFY \
> > $(call cc-option,-ffreestanding) \
> > $(call cc-option,-fno-stack-protector)
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>
> This is unlikely to conflict with anything going through the EFI tree,
> so feel free to queue it elsewhere.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-06 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-06 4:52 [PATCH] FORTIFY_SOURCE build fixes Kees Cook
2017-06-06 4:52 ` [PATCH 1/6] arm64, vdso: Define vdso_{start,end} as array Kees Cook
2017-06-06 9:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-06-06 9:49 ` Will Deacon
2017-06-06 16:11 ` Kees Cook
2017-06-06 4:52 ` [PATCH 2/6] efi: Avoid fortify checks in EFI stub Kees Cook
2017-06-06 17:13 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-06-06 17:17 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-06-07 3:12 ` Kees Cook
2017-06-07 8:54 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-06-08 2:37 ` Kees Cook
2017-06-09 9:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-06-16 9:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-06-07 9:27 ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-06 4:52 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86/power/64: Use char arrays for asm function names Kees Cook
2017-06-06 4:52 ` [PATCH 4/6] kexec_file: Adjust declaration of kexec_purgatory Kees Cook
2017-06-06 4:52 ` [PATCH 5/6] staging/rts5208: Fix read overflow in memcpy Kees Cook
2017-06-06 4:52 ` [PATCH 6/6] IB/rxe: Do not copy extra stack memory to skb Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170606171712.GA4483@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox