From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751559AbdFHLy2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2017 07:54:28 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46954 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750914AbdFHLy0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2017 07:54:26 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 28E1780C28 Authentication-Results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jolsa@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 28E1780C28 Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 13:54:22 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: David Carrillo-Cisneros Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Alexander Shishkin , Andi Kleen , Simon Que , Wang Nan , Jiri Olsa , He Kuang , Masami Hiramatsu , Stephane Eranian , Paul Turner Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/15] perf header: add a buffer to struct feat_fd Message-ID: <20170608115422.GA29151@krava> References: <20170606070722.35213-1-davidcc@google.com> <20170606070722.35213-12-davidcc@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170606070722.35213-12-davidcc@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:54:26 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 12:07:18AM -0700, David Carrillo-Cisneros wrote: SNIP > static int do_read_u32(struct feat_fd *ff, u32 *addr) > @@ -188,6 +233,10 @@ static char *do_read_string(struct feat_fd *ff) > static int write_tracing_data(struct feat_fd *ff, > struct perf_evlist *evlist) > { > + if (ff->buf) { > + WARN_ON("Pipe-mode doesn't supported write_tracing_data.\n"); > + return -1; > + } I think you need to use WARN or WARN_ONCE here, like: if (WARN_ONCE(ff->buf, "Pipe.....")) return -1; WARN_ON takes condition as an argument not string jirka