From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751658AbdFHUc6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2017 16:32:58 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:50022 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751475AbdFHUc5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2017 16:32:57 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 22:31:53 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Linus Torvalds , David Miller , Kyle McMartin , Kalle Valo , postmaster@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Daniel Wagner , David Woodhouse , Arend Van Spriel , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Li, Yi" , atull@kernel.org, Moritz Fischer , Petr Mladek , Johannes Berg , Emmanuel Grumbach , Luciano Coelho , Andy Lutomirski , Kees Cook , "AKASHI, Takahiro" , David Howells , Peter Jones , Hans de Goede , Alan Cox , Tom Gundersen Subject: Re: New vger mailing list request - linux-firmware Message-ID: <20170608203153.GA23191@kroah.com> References: <87poee4rwt.fsf@codeaurora.org> <20170608161942.GP27288@wotan.suse.de> <20170608.140904.2160287009636313040.davem@davemloft.net> <20170608193917.GA19849@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 01:25:17PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Linus Torvalds > wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> > >> Do users deserve the amount of silly regressions and issues we've seen > >> over the years on firmware_class ? Would yet-another mailing list help > >> ? I think so. > > > > No. > > > > Boutique mailing lists are generally a _bad_ thing. All it means that > > there's an increasingly small "in group" that thinks that they > > generate consensus beause nobody disagrees with their small boutique > > list, because nobody else even _sees_ that small list. > > > > We should only have mailing lists if they really merit the volume, and > > are big enough that there are lots of users. > > Even many device drivers tend to have mailing lists. While I see the > "in group" thing being a bad thing, I would say a few folks would be a > bit disturbed if they were requested to subscribe and read lkml to get > their driver updates they need to review. Its not clear to me where > the distinction should be made though. I tend to agree perhaps a > *vger* mailing list is not in merit for firmware_class, its not > obvious to me say an infradead.org list might not be in order. This is infrastructure that drivers use, not something huge and big that warrents a whole separate mailing list. Come on now, it's not that big of a chunk of code, no matter how complex the beast might be :) greg k-h > > Luis