public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH][-next] sched/deadline: make new function grub_reclaim static
@ 2017-06-09 11:08 Colin King
  2017-06-09 11:25 ` Luca Abeni
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Colin King @ 2017-06-09 11:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Luca Abeni, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, linux-kernel; +Cc: kernel-janitors

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Make function grub_reclaim static to clean up the following sparse
warning:

"warning: symbol 'grub_reclaim' was not declared. Should it be static?"

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index e12f85975857..2ddb4e6d820f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1052,7 +1052,7 @@ extern bool sched_rt_bandwidth_account(struct rt_rq *rt_rq);
  * should be larger than 2^(64 - 20 - 8), which is more than 64 seconds.
  * So, overflow is not an issue here.
  */
-u64 grub_reclaim(u64 delta, struct rq *rq, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
+static u64 grub_reclaim(u64 delta, struct rq *rq, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
 {
 	u64 u_inact = rq->dl.this_bw - rq->dl.running_bw; /* Utot - Uact */
 	u64 u_act;
-- 
2.11.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][-next] sched/deadline: make new function grub_reclaim static
  2017-06-09 11:08 [PATCH][-next] sched/deadline: make new function grub_reclaim static Colin King
@ 2017-06-09 11:25 ` Luca Abeni
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Luca Abeni @ 2017-06-09 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Colin King; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors

On Fri,  9 Jun 2017 12:08:51 +0100
Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:

> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> Make function grub_reclaim static to clean up the following sparse
> warning:
> 
> "warning: symbol 'grub_reclaim' was not declared. Should it be static?"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/deadline.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index e12f85975857..2ddb4e6d820f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -1052,7 +1052,7 @@ extern bool sched_rt_bandwidth_account(struct rt_rq *rt_rq);
>   * should be larger than 2^(64 - 20 - 8), which is more than 64 seconds.
>   * So, overflow is not an issue here.
>   */
> -u64 grub_reclaim(u64 delta, struct rq *rq, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
> +static u64 grub_reclaim(u64 delta, struct rq *rq, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
>  {
>  	u64 u_inact = rq->dl.this_bw - rq->dl.running_bw; /* Utot - Uact */
>  	u64 u_act;

Looks good; thanks for fixing this (and sorry for introducing the
warning).

Acked-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>



				Luca

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-06-09 11:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-06-09 11:08 [PATCH][-next] sched/deadline: make new function grub_reclaim static Colin King
2017-06-09 11:25 ` Luca Abeni

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox