From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753788AbdFMSye (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:54:34 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45248 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753742AbdFMSyd (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:54:33 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 8A2B219D229 Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jolsa@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 8A2B219D229 Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 20:54:29 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: David Carrillo-Cisneros Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Alexander Shishkin , Andi Kleen , Simon Que , Wang Nan , Jiri Olsa , He Kuang , Masami Hiramatsu , Stephane Eranian , Paul Turner Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/16] perf header: don't pass struct perf_file_section to process_##_feat Message-ID: <20170613185429.GB6092@krava> References: <20170613042932.141842-1-davidcc@google.com> <20170613042932.141842-10-davidcc@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170613042932.141842-10-davidcc@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Tue, 13 Jun 2017 18:54:32 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 09:29:25PM -0700, David Carrillo-Cisneros wrote: SNIP > struct cpu_cache_level *caches; > u32 cnt, i, version; > @@ -2084,8 +2073,7 @@ static int process_cache(struct perf_file_section *section __maybe_unused, > struct feature_ops { > int (*write)(struct feat_fd *ff, struct perf_evlist *evlist); > void (*print)(struct feat_fd *ff, FILE *fp); > - int (*process)(struct perf_file_section *section, > - struct feat_fd *ff, void *data); > + int (*process)(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data); > const char *name; > bool full_only; > }; > @@ -2616,9 +2604,11 @@ static int perf_file_section__process(struct perf_file_section *section, > struct perf_header *ph, > int feat, int fd, void *data) > { > - struct feat_fd ff = { > + struct feat_fd fdd = { no need to rename to fdd jirka