From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752397AbdFNK5r (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 14 Jun 2017 06:57:47 -0400
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:47774 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752371AbdFNK5o (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 14 Jun 2017 06:57:44 -0400
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DB75A239B5
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=acme@kernel.org
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:57:41 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf evsel: Fix probing of precise_ip level for
 default cycles event
Message-ID: <20170614105740.GB32020@kernel.org>
References: <20170613232343.4365-1-acme@kernel.org>
 <20170613232343.4365-2-acme@kernel.org>
 <20170614054500.exocsybw2qkug5tn@gmail.com>
 <20170614104426.GA32020@kernel.org>
 <20170614105154.lg5prmc2xfwivjfz@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170614105154.lg5prmc2xfwivjfz@gmail.com>
X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Em Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:51:55PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> 
> * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Can you try with the patch below, which is hackish but the minimal fix at this
> > point. Later I'll come up with a way of returning a fully configured cycles
> > evsel, which will make the tools code simpler, moving more stuff to the
> > libraries.
> 
> Yeah, this patch on top of your tree seems to work better now.

So how do we proceed, do you want to keep these two as separate or can I
squash them together, fix that problem with the unwind library and
provide a new perf/urgent for you to use?

Off to breakfast now tho :-)

- Arnaldo