public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Subject: perf: unwind: target platform=x86 not supported was:  Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf evsel: Fix probing of precise_ip level for default cycles event
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 10:52:42 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170614135242.GD32020@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170614132947.GC32020@kernel.org>

Em Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 10:29:47AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 07:45:01AM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> >  triton:~/tip> perf report --stdio
> >  unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
> >  unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
> >  unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
> >  unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
> >  unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
> >  unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
> >  unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
> >  unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
> 
> > # ========
> > # captured on: Wed Jun 14 07:34:42 2017
> > # hostname : triton
> > # os release : 4.10.0-23-generic
> > # perf version : 4.12.rc5.g9688eb
> > # arch : x86_64
> > # nrcpus online : 12
> > # nrcpus avail : 12
> > # cpudesc : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4960X CPU @ 3.60GHz
> > # cpuid : GenuineIntel,6,62,4
> > # total memory : 65917012 kB
> > # cmdline : /home/mingo/bin/perf record /home/mingo/hackbench 10 
> 
> > let me know if you need more info.
> > 
> > Btw., note that there's also this warning:
> > 
> >   unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
> > 
> > (but that's unrelated to this commit.)
> 
> Ok, what distro? Do you have libunwind-devel installed? I couldn't
> reproduce this one here with/without it installed, to test I build it
> with:
> 
>  make ARCH=x86_64 O=/tmp/build/perf -C tools/perf install-bin
> 
> and without that ARCH= setting, then I record with:
> 
>   perf record --call-graph dwarf -a sleep 2
> 
> and try what you said emitted that warning:
> 
>   perf report --stdio

So, the "unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported" comes only from:

a  tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind.c

That is linked by:

  $ grep libunwind-local tools/perf/util/Build 
  libperf-$(CONFIG_LOCAL_LIBUNWIND)    += unwind-libunwind-local.o
  $

And here CONFIG_LOCAL_LIBUNWIND is detected:

  [acme@jouet linux]$ grep CONFIG_LOCAL_LIBUNWIND /tmp/build/perf/.config-detected
  CONFIG_LOCAL_LIBUNWIND=y
  [acme@jouet linux]$ 

And that message is there:

  [acme@jouet linux]$ strings ~/bin/perf | grep "unwind: target platform="
  unwind: target platform=%s is not supported
  [acme@jouet linux]$

So the only way for get to that point would be for
local_unwind_libunwind_ops to be NULL, which it will be if its __weak
definition seting it to zero isn't overriden by...

tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind-local.c

#ifndef REMOTE_UNWIND_LIBUNWIND 
struct unwind_libunwind_ops * 
local_unwind_libunwind_ops = &_unwind_libunwind_ops;
#endif 

And what defines it is...

tools/perf/util/libunwind/x86_32.c:#define REMOTE_UNWIND_LIBUNWIND

(and a arm64 file, but lets leave that aside, seems unrelated to this
case)

That will get built by...

tools/perf/util/Build:libperf-$(CONFIG_LIBUNWIND_X86)      += libunwind/x86_32.o

[acme@jouet linux]$ grep CONFIG_LIBUNWIND_X86 /tmp/build/perf/.config-detected
[acme@jouet linux]$

Ingo, are you doing something unusual as building a 32-bit perf to read a
62-bit perf.data file?

Jiri, can you help here? Do you need more info?

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-14 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-13 23:23 [GIT PULL 0/2] perf/urgent fixes for 4.12 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-13 23:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf evsel: Fix probing of precise_ip level for default cycles event Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-14  5:45   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-14 10:44     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-14 10:51       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-14 10:57         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-14 13:55           ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-14 14:44             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-14 13:29     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-14 13:52       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2017-06-14 14:19         ` perf: unwind: target platform=x86 not supported was: " Jiri Olsa
2017-06-14 14:31           ` Jiri Olsa
2017-06-14 14:47           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-14 14:06       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-14 14:46         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-14 19:12         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-13 23:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf tools: Fix build with ARCH=x86_64 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-14  5:33 ` [GIT PULL 0/2] perf/urgent fixes for 4.12 Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170614135242.GD32020@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox