From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752139AbdFNOT4 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 14 Jun 2017 10:19:56 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:10334 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751868AbdFNOTz (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 14 Jun 2017 10:19:55 -0400
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 966A961D04
Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jolsa@redhat.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 966A961D04
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:19:51 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: perf: unwind: target platform=x86 not supported was:  Re: [PATCH
 1/2] perf evsel: Fix probing of precise_ip level for default cycles event
Message-ID: <20170614141951.GA14162@krava>
References: <20170613232343.4365-1-acme@kernel.org>
 <20170613232343.4365-2-acme@kernel.org>
 <20170614054500.exocsybw2qkug5tn@gmail.com>
 <20170614132947.GC32020@kernel.org>
 <20170614135242.GD32020@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170614135242.GD32020@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:19:54 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 10:52:42AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:

SNIP

> 
> And what defines it is...
> 
> tools/perf/util/libunwind/x86_32.c:#define REMOTE_UNWIND_LIBUNWIND
> 
> (and a arm64 file, but lets leave that aside, seems unrelated to this
> case)
> 
> That will get built by...
> 
> tools/perf/util/Build:libperf-$(CONFIG_LIBUNWIND_X86)      += libunwind/x86_32.o
> 
> [acme@jouet linux]$ grep CONFIG_LIBUNWIND_X86 /tmp/build/perf/.config-detected
> [acme@jouet linux]$
> 
> Ingo, are you doing something unusual as building a 32-bit perf to read a
> 62-bit perf.data file?
> 
> Jiri, can you help here? Do you need more info?

hum, looks like local unwind support wasn't compiled in for some reason

Ingo, what's the arch of host and perf data?

thanks,
jirka