From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752647AbdFNPEV (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 11:04:21 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:33326 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752555AbdFNPET (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 11:04:19 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 17:04:10 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Felix Schnizlein Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, yanmin.zhang@intel.com, trenn@suse.com, mingo@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv2 2/2] Implement sysfs based cpuinfo for x86 cpus. Message-ID: <20170614150410.GA15806@kroah.com> References: <1497450781-52354-1-git-send-email-fschnizlein@suse.com> <1497450781-52354-3-git-send-email-fschnizlein@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1497450781-52354-3-git-send-email-fschnizlein@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 04:33:01PM +0200, Felix Schnizlein wrote: > Signed-off-by: Felix Schnizlein > Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger > --- I know I reject flat-out any patch without a changelog text. And you NEVER can add a whole new feature without any text here at all, that's just crazy... Also, I almost never review RFC patches, as obviously the submitter doesn't think they are ready to be merged, so why should I review them just yet? :) thanks, greg k-h