From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Qemu crashes in -next due to 'of: remove *phandle properties from expanded device tree'
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:35:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170614223559.GA19172@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5941AB4E.3070804@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:31:58PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> Thanks for reporting this.
>
>
> On 06/14/17 12:26, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Hi Frank,
> >
> > your commit 'of: remove *phandle properties from expanded device tree' in
> > -next causes several of my ppc qemu tests to crash. Looking into qemu, it
> > sets "linux,phandle" properties for the mpic and for other devices.
> >
> > The crashes are along the line of
> >
> > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > kernel BUG at arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c:50!
> > Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#1]
> > SMP NR_CPUS=32
> > NUMA
> > CoreNet Generic
> > Modules linked in:
> > CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.12.0-rc5-next-20170614 #1
> > task: c000000000ad8cc0 task.stack: c000000000bec000
> > NIP: c000000000a8ca7c LR: c000000000a8ca6c CTR: c000000000a8ca20
> > REGS: c000000000befb90 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (4.12.0-rc5-next-20170614)
> > MSR: 0000000080021000 <CE,ME>
> > CR: 22000042 XER: 00000000
> > SOFTE: 0
> > GPR00: c000000000a8ca6c c000000000befe10 c000000000befa00 0000000000000000
> > GPR04: 0000000000000000 c000000000ac8458 c000000000ac8438 c000000000830658
> > GPR08: 0000000000000001 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000009531
> > GPR12: 0000000022000022 c00000003fff1000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> > GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> > GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> > GPR24: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> > GPR28: c000000000000300 c00000003fff2cc0 c000000000ac06e0 c000000000ac06e0
> > NIP [c000000000a8ca7c] .corenet_gen_pic_init+0x5c/0x90
> > LR [c000000000a8ca6c] .corenet_gen_pic_init+0x4c/0x90
> > Call Trace:
> > [c000000000befe10] [c000000000a8ca6c] .corenet_gen_pic_init+0x4c/0x90
> > (unreliable)
> > [c000000000befe80] [c000000000a832f8] .init_IRQ+0x34/0x4c
> > [c000000000befef0] [c000000000a7fc88] .start_kernel+0x2fc/0x500
> > [c000000000beff90] [c000000000000554] start_here_common+0x1c/0x48
> > Instruction dump:
> > e8aa0068 39088268 39407002 38600000 7fa54800 39205002 7caa4f9e 4bffe9e9
> > 60000000 2c230000 7d200026 55291ffe <0b090000> 4bfff335 60000000 3ca2ffdd
> > random: 0x600000003d220004 get_random_bytes called with crng_init=0
> > ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> >
> > and are caused by the kernel not finding the mpic node anymore.
> >
> > Any idea how to solve the problem ?
>
> The BUG() is triggered if mpic_alloc() returns NULL.
>
Yes, I got that far as well ...
> I looked through mpic_alloc(), and the functions that it calls, and nothing
> is jumping out as being related to phandles.
>
> Can you add some printks to mpic_alloc() to determine what problem is
> causing it to return NULL?
>
I'll try later tonight.
> Can you also include the console messages before the "[ cut here ]" line?
>
http://kerneltests.org/builders
Check qemu test results in the 'next' column. ppc and ppc64 show related console
messages.
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-14 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-14 19:26 Qemu crashes in -next due to 'of: remove *phandle properties from expanded device tree' Guenter Roeck
2017-06-14 21:31 ` Frank Rowand
2017-06-14 22:35 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2017-06-15 0:45 ` Frank Rowand
2017-06-15 2:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-06-15 4:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-06-15 7:58 ` Frank Rowand
2017-06-15 9:53 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-06-15 6:48 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170614223559.GA19172@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=frank.rowand@sony.com \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox