public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
	jeyu@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: warn in case userspace lied about modprobe return
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 22:57:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170620205746.GY21846@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170601180801.19827-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>

On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 11:08:01AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> kmod <= v19 was broken -- it could return 0 to modprobe calls,
> incorrectly assuming that a kernel module was built-in, whereas in
> reality the module was just forming in the kernel. The reason for this
> is an incorrect userspace heuristics. A userspace kmod fix is available
> for it [0], however should userspace break again we could go on with
> an failed get_fs_type() which is hard to debug as the request_module()
> is detected as returning 0. The first suspect would be that there is
> something worth with the kernel's module loader and obviously in this
> case that is not the issue.
> 
> Since these issues are painful to debug complain when we know userspace
> has outright lied to us.
> 
> [0] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/kernel/kmod/kmod.git/commit/libkmod/libkmod-module.c?id=fd44a98ae2eb5eb32161088954ab21e58e19dfc4
> 
> Suggested-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>

*poke* Al?

  Luis

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-20 20:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <lkml.kernel.org/r/20170601180347.GL8951@wotan.suse.de>
2017-06-01 18:08 ` [PATCH v2] fs: warn in case userspace lied about modprobe return Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-20 20:57   ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2017-06-23 18:27     ` Luis R. Rodriguez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170620205746.GY21846@wotan.suse.de \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox