public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: peterz@infradead.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	oleg@redhat.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com
Cc: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	ebiederm@xmission.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] swait: add idle variants which don't contribute to load average
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 14:45:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170620214548.6602-2-mcgrof@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170620214548.6602-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>

There are cases where folks are using an interruptible swait when
using kthreads. This is rather confusing given you'd expect
interruptible waits to be -- interruptible, but kthreads are not
interruptible ! The reason for such practice though is to avoid
having these kthreads contribute to the system load average.

When systems are idle some kthreads may spend a lot of time blocking if
using swait_event_timeout(). This would contribute to the system load
average. On systems without preemption this would mean the load average
of an idle system is bumped to 2 instead of 0. On systems with PREEMPT=y
this would mean the load average of an idle system is bumped to 3
instead of 0.

This adds proper API using TASK_IDLE to make such goals explicit and
avoid confusion.

Suggested-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/swait.h | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/swait.h b/include/linux/swait.h
index 2c700694d50a..10b80900b509 100644
--- a/include/linux/swait.h
+++ b/include/linux/swait.h
@@ -194,4 +194,59 @@ do {									\
 	__ret;								\
 })
 
+#define __swait_event_idle(wq, condition)				\
+	(void)___swait_event(wq, condition, TASK_IDLE, 0, schedule())
+
+/**
+ * swait_event_idle - wait without system load contribution
+ * @wq: the waitqueue to wait on
+ * @condition: a C expression for the event to wait for
+ *
+ * The process is put to sleep (TASK_IDLE) until the @condition evaluates to
+ * true. The @condition is checked each time the waitqueue @wq is woken up.
+ *
+ * This function is mostly used when a kthread or workqueue waits for some
+ * condition and doesn't want to contribute to system load. Signals are
+ * ignored.
+ */
+#define swait_event_idle(wq, condition)					\
+do {									\
+	if (condition)							\
+		break;							\
+	__swait_event_idle(wq, condition);				\
+} while (0)
+
+#define __swait_event_idle_timeout(wq, condition, timeout)		\
+	___swait_event(wq, ___wait_cond_timeout(condition),		\
+		       TASK_IDLE, timeout,				\
+		       __ret = schedule_timeout(__ret))
+
+/**
+ * swait_event_idle_timeout - wait up to timeout without load contribution
+ * @wq: the waitqueue to wait on
+ * @condition: a C expression for the event to wait for
+ * @timeout: timeout at which we'll give up in jiffies
+ *
+ * The process is put to sleep (TASK_IDLE) until the @condition evaluates to
+ * true. The @condition is checked each time the waitqueue @wq is woken up.
+ *
+ * This function is mostly used when a kthread or workqueue waits for some
+ * condition and doesn't want to contribute to system load. Signals are
+ * ignored.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * 0 if the @condition evaluated to %false after the @timeout elapsed,
+ * 1 if the @condition evaluated to %true after the @timeout elapsed,
+ * or the remaining jiffies (at least 1) if the @condition evaluated
+ * to %true before the @timeout elapsed.
+ */
+#define swait_event_idle_timeout(wq, condition, timeout)		\
+({									\
+	long __ret = timeout;						\
+	if (!___wait_cond_timeout(condition))				\
+		__ret = __swait_event_idle_timeout(wq,			\
+						   condition, timeout);	\
+	__ret;								\
+})
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_SWAIT_H */
-- 
2.11.0

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-20 21:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-14 23:06 [RFC] rcu: use killable versions of swait Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-14 23:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-15 15:50   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-15 16:22     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-15 16:35       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-15 16:55         ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-06-15 18:48           ` [RFC v2 0/2] swait: add idle to make idle-hacks on kthreads explicit Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-15 18:48             ` [RFC v2 1/2] swait: add idle variants which don't contribute to load average Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-16  0:47               ` Boqun Feng
2017-06-20 21:32                 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-16 20:31               ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-06-19 17:53                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-15 18:48             ` [RFC v2 2/2] rcu: use idle versions of swait to make idle-hack clear Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-15 21:57             ` [RFC v2 0/2] swait: add idle to make idle-hacks on kthreads explicit Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-15 23:26               ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-15 23:43                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-16 20:37                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-06-19 17:54                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-20 21:45             ` [PATCH " Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-20 21:45               ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2017-06-20 21:45               ` [PATCH 2/2] rcu: use idle versions of swait to make idle-hack clear Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-21 16:48               ` [PATCH 0/2] swait: add idle to make idle-hacks on kthreads explicit Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-21 17:57                 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-21 18:19                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-15 17:34         ` [RFC] rcu: use killable versions of swait Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170620214548.6602-2-mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox