From: riel@redhat.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
danielmicay@gmail.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
hughd@google.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] arm64/mmap: properly account for stack randomization in mmap_base
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:00:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170622200033.25714-3-riel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170622200033.25714-1-riel@redhat.com>
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
When RLIMIT_STACK is, for example, 256MB, the current code results in
a gap between the top of the task and mmap_base of 256MB, failing to
take into account the amount by which the stack address was randomized.
In other words, the stack gets less than RLIMIT_STACK space.
Ensure that the gap between the stack and mmap_base always takes stack
randomization and the stack guard gap into account.
>From Daniel Micay's linux-hardened tree.
Reported-by: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
---
arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c
index 7b0d55756eb1..a0cb6b8ccde7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
* Leave enough space between the mmap area and the stack to honour ulimit in
* the face of randomisation.
*/
-#define MIN_GAP (SZ_128M + ((STACK_RND_MASK << PAGE_SHIFT) + 1))
+#define MIN_GAP (SZ_128M)
#define MAX_GAP (STACK_TOP/6*5)
static int mmap_is_legacy(void)
@@ -64,6 +64,11 @@ unsigned long arch_mmap_rnd(void)
static unsigned long mmap_base(unsigned long rnd)
{
unsigned long gap = rlimit(RLIMIT_STACK);
+ unsigned long pad = (STACK_RND_MASK << PAGE_SHIFT) + stack_guard_gap;
+
+ /* Values close to RLIM_INFINITY can overflow. */
+ if (gap + pad > gap)
+ gap += pad;
if (gap < MIN_GAP)
gap = MIN_GAP;
--
2.9.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-22 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-22 20:00 [PATCH 0/3] properly account for stack randomization and guard gap riel
2017-06-22 20:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/mmap: properly account for stack randomization in mmap_base riel
2017-06-22 20:00 ` riel [this message]
2017-06-22 20:00 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc,mmap: " riel
2017-06-23 8:35 ` [PATCH 0/3] properly account for stack randomization and guard gap Ingo Molnar
2017-06-23 15:13 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170622200033.25714-3-riel@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=danielmicay@gmail.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).