From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751875AbdFZQw3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:52:29 -0400 Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:58802 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751456AbdFZQwY (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:52:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:52:15 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Lin Zhang Cc: kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, fw@strlen.de, davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netfilter: conntrack: add a new NF_CT_EXT_EXPAND extension Message-ID: <20170626165215.GA6562@salvia> References: <1498457446-30135-1-git-send-email-xiaolou4617@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1498457446-30135-1-git-send-email-xiaolou4617@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 02:10:46PM +0800, Lin Zhang wrote: > In the current conntrack extend code, if we want to add a new > extension, we must be add a new extension id and recompile kernel. Yes, this is designed in this way on purpose. Because we do not want to endorse proliferation of out-of-tree kernel modules. Sorry, we cannot take this.