From: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: "Michał Kępień" <kernel@kempniu.pl>,
"Jonathan Woithe" <jwoithe@just42.net>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@infradead.org>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: do not use kfifo for storing hotkey scancodes
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:07:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170627000718.GA11146@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40512901.HXkrFCdsVg@aspire.rjw.lan>
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 02:25:46AM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 11:15:43 AM Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 06:40:52AM +0200, Michał Kępień wrote:
> > > All ACPI device notify callbacks are invoked using acpi_os_execute(),
> > > which causes the supplied callback to be queued to a static workqueue
> > > which always executes on CPU 0. This means that there is no possibility
> > > for any ACPI device notify callback to be concurrently executed on
> > > multiple CPUs, which in the case of fujitsu-laptop means that using a
> > > locked kfifo for handling hotkeys is redundant: as hotkey scancodes are
> > > only pushed and popped from within acpi_fujitsu_laptop_notify(), no risk
> > > of concurrent pushing and popping exists.
> >
> > Was the kfifo causing a problem currently or for the migration to separate
> > modules? Is this purely a simplification?
> >
> > Rafael, the above rationale appears sound to me. Do you have any concerns?
>
> I actually do.
>
> While this is the case today, making the driver code depend on it in a hard way
> sort of makes it difficult to change in the future if need be.
OK, if we aren't guaranteed for this to run on CPU 0 in the future, and this
will be annoying to debug if it does changes, let's skip the kfifo change.
I have removed this patch, and fixed up the merge conflicts of the remaining 6
patches here:
http://git.infradead.org/linux-platform-drivers-x86.git/shortlog/refs/heads/fujitsu
Michal / Jonathan, would you please review and let me know if this is what you
would have done / approve the rebase?
Thanks,
--
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-27 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-16 4:40 [PATCH 0/7] fujitsu-laptop: ACPI-related cleanups Michał Kępień
2017-06-16 4:40 ` [PATCH 1/7] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: do not use kfifo for storing hotkey scancodes Michał Kępień
2017-06-21 18:15 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-21 23:50 ` Jonathan Woithe
2017-06-22 2:44 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-22 3:01 ` Jonathan Woithe
2017-06-22 20:46 ` Michał Kępień
2017-06-22 23:58 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-23 0:14 ` Jonathan Woithe
2017-06-23 5:54 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-22 20:08 ` Michał Kępień
2017-06-24 0:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-27 0:07 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2017-06-27 12:16 ` Jonathan Woithe
2017-06-28 4:30 ` Michał Kępień
2017-06-28 16:03 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-16 4:40 ` [PATCH 2/7] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: remove redundant safety checks Michał Kępień
2017-06-16 4:40 ` [PATCH 3/7] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: use strcpy to set ACPI device names and classes Michał Kępień
2017-06-16 4:40 ` [PATCH 4/7] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: sanitize hotkey input device identification Michał Kępień
2017-06-16 4:40 ` [PATCH 5/7] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: do not update ACPI device power status Michał Kępień
2017-06-21 20:17 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-22 21:02 ` Michał Kępień
2017-06-22 23:58 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-23 0:16 ` Jonathan Woithe
2017-06-23 5:52 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-16 4:40 ` [PATCH 6/7] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: do not evaluate ACPI _INI methods Michał Kępień
2017-06-16 4:40 ` [PATCH 7/7] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: rework debugging Michał Kępień
2017-06-18 10:35 ` [PATCH 0/7] fujitsu-laptop: ACPI-related cleanups Jonathan Woithe
2017-06-22 23:57 ` Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170627000718.GA11146@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=jwoithe@just42.net \
--cc=kernel@kempniu.pl \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).