From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
rafal@milecki.pl, Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
yi1.li@linux.intel.com, atull@opensource.altera.com,
Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@ettus.com>,
pmladek@suse.com, Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com, luciano.coelho@intel.com,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
luto@kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
"AKASHI, Takahiro" <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
pjones@redhat.com, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
alan@linux.intel.com, tytso@mit.edu,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: remove request_firmware_into_buf()
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 10:37:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170627173711.GJ18666@tuxbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170627065253.GB29909@kroah.com>
On Mon 26 Jun 23:52 PDT 2017, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:22:41PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > As Luis pointed out, there are no in-kernel users of
> > > request_firmware_into_buf(), so remove it, and the now unused internal
> > > flag, which simplifies the logic around buffer handling a bit.
> > >
> >
> > This API was implemented to reduce the memory pressure during firmware
> > load in the Qualcomm remoteprocs, but it wasn't available when I
> > upstreamed that code and I apparently forgot to send out the patch
> > moving us over to use this API...
> >
> > Especially when loading the Qualcomm modem we have a couple of files
> > that we request_firmware() that are 10-15MB in size, so this
> > functionality is definitely wanted.
> >
> >
> > As we are calling release_firmware() immediately following the
> > request_firmware() I did attempt to just call
> > kernel_read_file_from_path() directly, but as I don't have access to
> > the fw_path[] this becomes inconsistent, so I would like to keep
> > request_firmware_into_buf().
>
> Why would we keep it if there is no in-tree user for it? If you want it
> sometime in the future, great, we can revert the deletion then, but
> keeping it around for nothing isn't ok, you know that :)
>
Of course I know that :)
I did put a patch in the tubes for this yesterday [1], it's late for
v4.13, but I would be happy to see the API stay and we would have a user
in v4.14 (and tick this off Qualcomm's "required" list).
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/6/26/693
Regards,
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-27 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-23 16:03 [PATCH] firmware: remove request_firmware_into_buf() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-06-26 20:22 ` Bjorn Andersson
2017-06-27 6:52 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-06-27 17:37 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2017-07-12 23:44 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-07-13 7:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-06-27 12:54 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170627173711.GJ18666@tuxbook \
--to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
--cc=atull@opensource.altera.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luciano.coelho@intel.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=moritz.fischer@ettus.com \
--cc=pjones@redhat.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=wagi@monom.org \
--cc=yi1.li@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox