From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751810AbdF1Qza (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2017 12:55:30 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f196.google.com ([209.85.192.196]:35140 "EHLO mail-pf0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751516AbdF1QzX (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2017 12:55:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 09:55:20 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Kees Cook Cc: "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" , David Windsor , Linux-MM , LKML Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 17/23] dcache: define usercopy region in dentry_cache slab cache Message-ID: <20170628165520.GA129364@gmail.com> References: <1497915397-93805-1-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> <1497915397-93805-18-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> <20170620040834.GB610@zzz.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 09:44:13AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Eric Biggers wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 04:36:31PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > >> From: David Windsor > >> > >> When a dentry name is short enough, it can be stored directly in > >> the dentry itself. These dentry short names, stored in struct > >> dentry.d_iname and therefore contained in the dentry_cache slab cache, > >> need to be coped to/from userspace. > >> > >> In support of usercopy hardening, this patch defines a region in > >> the dentry_cache slab cache in which userspace copy operations > >> are allowed. > >> > >> This region is known as the slab cache's usercopy region. Slab > >> caches can now check that each copy operation involving cache-managed > >> memory falls entirely within the slab's usercopy region. > >> > >> This patch is modified from Brad Spengler/PaX Team's PAX_USERCOPY > >> whitelisting code in the last public patch of grsecurity/PaX based on my > >> understanding of the code. Changes or omissions from the original code are > >> mine and don't reflect the original grsecurity/PaX code. > >> > > > > For all these patches please mention *where* the data is being copied to/from > > userspace. > > Can you explain what you mean here? The field being copied is already > mentioned in the commit log; do you mean where in the kernel source > does the copy happen? > Yes, for the ones where it isn't obvious, mentioning a syscall or ioctl might be sufficient. Others may need more explanation. Eric