From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752803AbdF3TuM (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2017 15:50:12 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47016 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752444AbdF3TuK (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2017 15:50:10 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com B4B8B85547 Authentication-Results: ext-mx04.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx04.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jglisse@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com B4B8B85547 Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 15:49:56 -0400 From: Jerome Glisse To: John Hubbard Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Dan Williams , David Nellans Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] HMM (Heterogeneous Memory Management) v24 Message-ID: <20170630194956.GB4275@redhat.com> References: <20170628180047.5386-1-jglisse@redhat.com> <960ef002-3cfd-5b91-054e-aa685abc5f1f@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <960ef002-3cfd-5b91-054e-aa685abc5f1f@nvidia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Fri, 30 Jun 2017 19:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:32:49PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote: > On 06/28/2017 11:00 AM, Jérôme Glisse wrote: > > > > Patchset is on top of git://git.cmpxchg.org/linux-mmotm.git so i > > test same kernel as kbuild system, git branch: > > > > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~glisse/linux/log/?h=hmm-v24 > > > > Change since v23 is code comment fixes, simplify kernel configuration and > > improve allocation of new page on migration do device memory (last patch > > in this patchset). > > Hi Jerome, > > Tiny note: one more change is that hmm_devmem_fault_range() has been > removed (and thanks for taking care of that, btw). True i forgot to mention that. > > Anyway, this looks good. A basic smoke test shows the following: > > 1. We definitely *require* your other patch, > "[PATCH] x86/mm/hotplug: fix BUG_ON() after hotremove by not freeing pud v3", > otherwise I will reliably hit that bug every time I run my simple page fault > test. So, let me know if I should ping that thread. It looks like your patch > was not rejected, but I can't tell if (!rejected == accepted), there. :) Ingo did pick it up so it should shows in Linus tree soon i expect. Cheers, Jérôme