From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755123AbdGCSNh (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jul 2017 14:13:37 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:48920 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754208AbdGCSNf (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jul 2017 14:13:35 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 12:13:32 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Kamil Rytarowski Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Masahiro Yamada , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the jc_docs tree with the kbuild tree Message-ID: <20170703121332.2f0d43b5@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <054dc72a-39ce-ee8c-62d1-c17f487009de@gmx.com> References: <20170626111331.5443587b@canb.auug.org.au> <20170703125859.0678914b@canb.auug.org.au> <054dc72a-39ce-ee8c-62d1-c17f487009de@gmx.com> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 18:43:32 +0200 Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > Am I expected to do it myself and resend a new patch? > No, there should be no need for that. I've already mentioned the issue in my pull request; if the same happens on the kbuild side, Linus will not have a hard time figuring out what to do. jon