From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754250AbdGCSdF (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jul 2017 14:33:05 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:54535 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752113AbdGCSdE (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jul 2017 14:33:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 04:33:00 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Kamil Rytarowski Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Masahiro Yamada , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the jc_docs tree with the kbuild tree Message-ID: <20170704043247.52e889ba@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <054dc72a-39ce-ee8c-62d1-c17f487009de@gmx.com> References: <20170626111331.5443587b@canb.auug.org.au> <20170703125859.0678914b@canb.auug.org.au> <054dc72a-39ce-ee8c-62d1-c17f487009de@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Kamil, On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 18:43:32 +0200 Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > > Am I expected to do it myself and resend a new patch? No, this conflict is not very hard to fix up, so Linus just needs to be told it exists as a courtesy. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell