public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	thgarnie@google.com, caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com,
	izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/boot/KASLR: Restrict kernel to be randomized in mirror regions
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 16:36:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170704153633.GA3149@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1707041643400.9000@nanos>

On Tue, 04 Jul, at 04:46:58PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2017, Baoquan He wrote:
>  
> > In fact I just referred to code in setup_arch(). Now I have a question,
> > though CONFIG_EFI=y but efi firmware is not enabled,
> > boot_params.efi_info.efi_loader_signature should be initilized to 0.
> > Then below code is also problematic.
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_EFI
> >         if (!strncmp((char *)&boot_params.efi_info.efi_loader_signature,                                                                         
> >                      EFI32_LOADER_SIGNATURE, 4)) {
> >                 set_bit(EFI_BOOT, &efi.flags);
> >         } else if (!strncmp((char *)&boot_params.efi_info.efi_loader_signature,
> >                      EFI64_LOADER_SIGNATURE, 4)) {
> >                 set_bit(EFI_BOOT, &efi.flags);
> >                 set_bit(EFI_64BIT, &efi.flags);
> >         }
> > 
> >         if (efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT))
> >                 efi_memblock_x86_reserve_range();
> > #endif
> 
> Indeed. Matt?

It's possibly that I'm missing some context, but boot_params should be
zero'd -- the x86 boot protocol requires that the entire data
structure be zero'd on allocation.

Have I missed something?

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-04 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-04  8:04 [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/boot/KASLR: Restrict kernel to be randomized in mirror regions Baoquan He
2017-07-04  8:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/boot/KASLR: Adapt process_e820_entry for any type of memory entry Baoquan He
2017-07-05 22:06   ` Kees Cook
2017-07-06  1:21     ` Baoquan He
2017-07-04  8:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/boot/KASLR: Restrict kernel to be randomized in mirror regions Baoquan He
2017-07-04 14:00   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-04 14:30     ` Baoquan He
2017-07-04 14:46       ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-04 15:36         ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2017-07-04 15:46           ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-04 23:16             ` Baoquan He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170704153633.GA3149@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --to=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thgarnie@google.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox