linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
To: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@suse.com>,
	"Corentin Chary" <corentin.chary@gmail.com>,
	acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
	"Dave Airlie" <airlied@redhat.com>,
	"Oleksij Rempel" <linux@rempel-privat.de>,
	"João Paulo Rechi Vita" <jprvita@gmail.com>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:51:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170705095113.GI2102@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201706171847.54407@pali>

On Saturday 17 June 2017 18:47:54 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > So problematic drivers which use instance=1 without any comments are:
> > 
> >   acer-wmi
> >   asus-wmi
> >   mxm-wmi
> 
> Adding authors & maintainers of those drivers in loop.

Hi!

Dell drivers and acer-wmi are fixed now. So only asus-wmi and mxm-wmi
needs to be investigated.

Adding more people who developed those drivers recently in loop. Can you
check if instance number is used correctly or not?

> WMI instance number is indexed from zero and therefore first instance
> number is 0, not 1. Can you check if for drivers and wmi functions
> (specified below) is really correct to use WMI instance number one?
> 
> In case in _WDG is specified for particular GUID that instance_count is
> 1, it means the only allowed instance number is 0 (first and the only
> one).
> 
> In some cases, when there is only one instance for WMI method, ACPI WMI
> bytecode does not check instance number, so any passed value is
> accepted by ACPI. But in current patch I'm trying to fix check for
> valid instance number based on instance_count information from _WDG.
> 
> So I need to know if nothing would be broken. And in case those driver
> issue invalid/incorrect instance number, they needs to be fixed.
> 
> Can you look at it? Simple look into _WDG dump should be enough... just
> check if instance number called from wmi driver is less then
> instance_count from _WDG.
> 
> On Wednesday 14 June 2017 17:46:54 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Function wmi_query_block:
> > 
> >   acer-wmi.c:
> >   instance=1 /* no comment why, guid=95764E09-FB56-4E83-B31A-37761F60994A */
> > 
>  
> > Function wmi_evaluate_method:
> > 
> >   acer-wmi.c:
> >   instance=1 /* no comment why, guid=67C3371D-95A3-4C37-BB61-DD47B491DAAB */
> >   instance=1 /* no comment why, guid=6AF4F258-B401-42FD-BE91-3D4AC2D7C0D3 */
> > 
> >   asus-wmi.c:
> >   instance=1 /* no comment why, guid=97845ED0-4E6D-11DE-8A39-0800200C9A66 */
> > 
> >   mxm-wmi.c:
> >   instance=1 /* no comment why, guid=F6CB5C3C-9CAE-4EBD-B577-931EA32A2CC0 */
> 

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-05  9:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-27 11:55 [PATCH] RFC: platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number Pali Rohár
2017-06-10 19:15 ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-13 16:49   ` Darren Hart
2017-06-13 18:04     ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-13 18:42       ` Darren Hart
2017-06-14 15:46         ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-14 20:39           ` Darren Hart
2017-06-15 13:59           ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-15 15:16             ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-06-16 16:33             ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-06-17 16:34               ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-21 21:52                 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-06-22  7:33                   ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-17 16:47           ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-19 15:02             ` joeyli
2017-07-05  9:51             ` Pali Rohár [this message]
2017-07-05 19:30               ` David Airlie
2017-07-05 20:24                 ` Pali Rohár
2017-08-06 15:35                   ` Pali Rohár
2017-08-06 16:10                     ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-06 20:21                       ` Pali Rohár
2017-08-06 15:42           ` Pali Rohár
2017-08-06 16:18             ` Hans de Goede
2017-08-06 20:16               ` Pali Rohár

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170705095113.GI2102@pali \
    --to=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
    --cc=acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=corentin.chary@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=jlee@suse.com \
    --cc=jprvita@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rempel-privat.de \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).