From: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
To: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@suse.com>,
"Corentin Chary" <corentin.chary@gmail.com>,
acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
"Dave Airlie" <airlied@redhat.com>,
"Oleksij Rempel" <linux@rempel-privat.de>,
"João Paulo Rechi Vita" <jprvita@gmail.com>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:51:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170705095113.GI2102@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201706171847.54407@pali>
On Saturday 17 June 2017 18:47:54 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > So problematic drivers which use instance=1 without any comments are:
> >
> > acer-wmi
> > asus-wmi
> > mxm-wmi
>
> Adding authors & maintainers of those drivers in loop.
Hi!
Dell drivers and acer-wmi are fixed now. So only asus-wmi and mxm-wmi
needs to be investigated.
Adding more people who developed those drivers recently in loop. Can you
check if instance number is used correctly or not?
> WMI instance number is indexed from zero and therefore first instance
> number is 0, not 1. Can you check if for drivers and wmi functions
> (specified below) is really correct to use WMI instance number one?
>
> In case in _WDG is specified for particular GUID that instance_count is
> 1, it means the only allowed instance number is 0 (first and the only
> one).
>
> In some cases, when there is only one instance for WMI method, ACPI WMI
> bytecode does not check instance number, so any passed value is
> accepted by ACPI. But in current patch I'm trying to fix check for
> valid instance number based on instance_count information from _WDG.
>
> So I need to know if nothing would be broken. And in case those driver
> issue invalid/incorrect instance number, they needs to be fixed.
>
> Can you look at it? Simple look into _WDG dump should be enough... just
> check if instance number called from wmi driver is less then
> instance_count from _WDG.
>
> On Wednesday 14 June 2017 17:46:54 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Function wmi_query_block:
> >
> > acer-wmi.c:
> > instance=1 /* no comment why, guid=95764E09-FB56-4E83-B31A-37761F60994A */
> >
>
> > Function wmi_evaluate_method:
> >
> > acer-wmi.c:
> > instance=1 /* no comment why, guid=67C3371D-95A3-4C37-BB61-DD47B491DAAB */
> > instance=1 /* no comment why, guid=6AF4F258-B401-42FD-BE91-3D4AC2D7C0D3 */
> >
> > asus-wmi.c:
> > instance=1 /* no comment why, guid=97845ED0-4E6D-11DE-8A39-0800200C9A66 */
> >
> > mxm-wmi.c:
> > instance=1 /* no comment why, guid=F6CB5C3C-9CAE-4EBD-B577-931EA32A2CC0 */
>
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-05 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-27 11:55 [PATCH] RFC: platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number Pali Rohár
2017-06-10 19:15 ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-13 16:49 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-13 18:04 ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-13 18:42 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-14 15:46 ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-14 20:39 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-15 13:59 ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-15 15:16 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-06-16 16:33 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-06-17 16:34 ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-21 21:52 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-06-22 7:33 ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-17 16:47 ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-19 15:02 ` joeyli
2017-07-05 9:51 ` Pali Rohár [this message]
2017-07-05 19:30 ` David Airlie
2017-07-05 20:24 ` Pali Rohár
2017-08-06 15:35 ` Pali Rohár
2017-08-06 16:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-06 20:21 ` Pali Rohár
2017-08-06 15:42 ` Pali Rohár
2017-08-06 16:18 ` Hans de Goede
2017-08-06 20:16 ` Pali Rohár
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170705095113.GI2102@pali \
--to=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=corentin.chary@gmail.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=jlee@suse.com \
--cc=jprvita@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rempel-privat.de \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).