From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753021AbdGEUdk (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jul 2017 16:33:40 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:52725 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752967AbdGEUdj (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jul 2017 16:33:39 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 13:33:35 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Helge Deller Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Thomas Bogendoerfer , jejb@parisc-linux.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] parisc: DMA API: return error instead of BUG_ON for dma ops on non dma devs Message-ID: <20170705203335.GA10792@infradead.org> References: <20170703084920.142A9508094@solo.franken.de> <83ff44f5-8989-c806-bef3-29fb9c909bee@gmx.de> <20170705185756.GA18087@infradead.org> <9de25038-5a0e-697d-dfb4-b6eb65189079@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9de25038-5a0e-697d-dfb4-b6eb65189079@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 09:36:09PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote: > On 05.07.2017 20:57, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > I've got a tree pending that removes DMA_ERROR_CODE, and it's been > > in linux-next for a while. > > I had the parisc patch in for-next as well and didn't received > any warnings. There are no warnings, as the macro just won't be used by common code anymore. But the commit is from July 3rd, and the pull request to Linus for it was merged on the same day. I can't see how it could have been in linux-next for long. It certainly wasn't in the last linux-next release that I looked at before the long weekend (the July 30 one) > Can we please change this to something like > "Prepare parisc to get rid of DMA_ERROR_CODE tree-wide" ? > It's somewhat more neutral. Fine with me.