linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>,
	Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com (maintainer:BROADCOM
	BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE),
	linux-mips@linux-mips.org (open list:BROADCOM BMIPS MIPS
	ARCHITECTURE),
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list:IRQCHIP DRIVERS),
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:BROADCOM
	BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE)
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] irqchip: brcmstb-l2: Abstract register accesses
Date: Fri,  7 Jul 2017 12:20:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170707192016.13001-6-opendmb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170707192016.13001-1-opendmb@gmail.com>

Added register block offsets to the brcmstb_l2_intc_data structure
for the status and mask registers to support reading the active
interupts in an abstracted way.  It seems like an irq_chip method
should have been provided for this, but it's not there yet.

Abstracted the implementation of the handler, suspend, and resume
functions to not use any hard coded register offsets.

Signed-off-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c
index 977ae55d47d4..ce3850530e2b 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c
@@ -43,6 +43,8 @@
 struct brcmstb_l2_intc_data {
 	struct irq_domain *domain;
 	struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
+	int status_offset;
+	int mask_offset;
 	bool can_wake;
 	u32 saved_mask; /* for suspend/resume */
 };
@@ -56,8 +58,8 @@ static void brcmstb_l2_intc_irq_handle(struct irq_desc *desc)
 
 	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
 
-	status = irq_reg_readl(b->gc, CPU_STATUS) &
-		~(irq_reg_readl(b->gc, CPU_MASK_STATUS));
+	status = irq_reg_readl(b->gc, b->status_offset) &
+		~(irq_reg_readl(b->gc, b->mask_offset));
 
 	if (status == 0) {
 		raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock);
@@ -78,16 +80,17 @@ static void brcmstb_l2_intc_irq_handle(struct irq_desc *desc)
 static void brcmstb_l2_intc_suspend(struct irq_data *d)
 {
 	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct irq_chip_type *ct = irq_data_get_chip_type(d);
 	struct brcmstb_l2_intc_data *b = gc->private;
 
 	irq_gc_lock(gc);
 	/* Save the current mask */
-	b->saved_mask = irq_reg_readl(gc, CPU_MASK_STATUS);
+	b->saved_mask = irq_reg_readl(gc, ct->regs.mask);
 
 	if (b->can_wake) {
 		/* Program the wakeup mask */
-		irq_reg_writel(gc, ~gc->wake_active, CPU_MASK_SET);
-		irq_reg_writel(gc, gc->wake_active, CPU_MASK_CLEAR);
+		irq_reg_writel(gc, ~gc->wake_active, ct->regs.disable);
+		irq_reg_writel(gc, gc->wake_active, ct->regs.enable);
 	}
 	irq_gc_unlock(gc);
 }
@@ -95,15 +98,19 @@ static void brcmstb_l2_intc_suspend(struct irq_data *d)
 static void brcmstb_l2_intc_resume(struct irq_data *d)
 {
 	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	struct irq_chip_type *ct = irq_data_get_chip_type(d);
 	struct brcmstb_l2_intc_data *b = gc->private;
 
 	irq_gc_lock(gc);
-	/* Clear unmasked non-wakeup interrupts */
-	irq_reg_writel(gc, ~b->saved_mask & ~gc->wake_active, CPU_CLEAR);
+	if (ct->chip.irq_ack != irq_gc_noop) {
+		/* Clear unmasked non-wakeup interrupts */
+		irq_reg_writel(gc, ~b->saved_mask & ~gc->wake_active,
+				ct->regs.ack);
+	}
 
 	/* Restore the saved mask */
-	irq_reg_writel(gc, b->saved_mask, CPU_MASK_SET);
-	irq_reg_writel(gc, ~b->saved_mask, CPU_MASK_CLEAR);
+	irq_reg_writel(gc, b->saved_mask, ct->regs.disable);
+	irq_reg_writel(gc, ~b->saved_mask, ct->regs.enable);
 	irq_gc_unlock(gc);
 }
 
@@ -173,6 +180,9 @@ static int __init brcmstb_l2_intc_of_init(struct device_node *np,
 	data->gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(data->domain, 0);
 	data->gc->reg_base = base;
 	data->gc->private = data;
+	data->status_offset = CPU_STATUS;
+	data->mask_offset = CPU_MASK_STATUS;
+
 	ct = data->gc->chip_types;
 
 	ct->chip.irq_ack = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
@@ -181,6 +191,7 @@ static int __init brcmstb_l2_intc_of_init(struct device_node *np,
 	ct->chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_disable_reg;
 	ct->chip.irq_mask_ack = irq_gc_mask_disable_and_ack_set;
 	ct->regs.disable = CPU_MASK_SET;
+	ct->regs.mask = CPU_MASK_STATUS;
 
 	ct->chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_unmask_enable_reg;
 	ct->regs.enable = CPU_MASK_CLEAR;
-- 
2.13.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-07 19:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20170707192016.13001-1-opendmb@gmail.com>
2017-07-07 19:20 ` [PATCH 1/6] genirq: generic chip: add generic irq_mask_ack functions Doug Berger
2017-07-08 12:08   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-10 17:39     ` Doug Berger
2017-07-17 17:23       ` Doug Berger
2017-07-17 20:58         ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-12 19:24   ` Doug Berger
2017-07-12 20:49     ` Måns Rullgård
2017-07-07 19:20 ` [PATCH 2/6] irqchip/tango: Use irq_gc_mask_disable_and_ack_set Doug Berger
2017-07-12 12:34   ` Marc Gonzalez
2017-07-13 10:16     ` Måns Rullgård
2017-07-07 19:20 ` [PATCH 3/6] genirq: generic chip: remove irq_gc_mask_disable_reg_and_ack() Doug Berger
2017-07-07 19:20 ` [PATCH 4/6] irqchip: brcmstb-l2: Remove some processing from the handler Doug Berger
2017-07-10 15:53   ` Florian Fainelli
2017-07-07 19:20 ` Doug Berger [this message]
2017-07-10 15:54   ` [PATCH 5/6] irqchip: brcmstb-l2: Abstract register accesses Florian Fainelli
2017-07-07 19:20 ` [PATCH 6/6] irqchip: brcmstb-l2: Add support for the BCM7271 L2 controller Doug Berger
2017-07-10 15:53   ` Rob Herring
2017-07-10 15:54   ` Florian Fainelli
2017-07-07 19:34 ` [PATCH 0/6] Add support for BCM7271 style interrupt controller Doug Berger
2017-07-07 19:39   ` Florian Fainelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170707192016.13001-6-opendmb@gmail.com \
    --to=opendmb@gmail.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=cernekee@gmail.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregory.0xf0@gmail.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).