From: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
<izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] x86/boot/KASLR: Restrict kernel to be randomized in mirror regions
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:48:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170710024848.GA27579@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170710014729.GC13560@x1>
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 09:47:29AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>On 07/09/17 at 07:11am, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
>> > +/* Marks if efi mirror regions have been found and handled. */
>> > +static bool efi_mirror_found;
>>
>> I think this is only ever checked once? How about having
>> process_efi_entries return bool to indicate if mirror was found? Also,
>> that function should be behind #ifdef. Let's do something like this:
>>
>>
>> > +
>> > +static void process_efi_entries(unsigned long minimum,
>> > + unsigned long image_size)
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_EFI
>> /* Returns true if mirror region found (and further scanning should stop) */
>
>Well, here it might be not like that. The mirror regions could be multiple,
>we need find and process each of them to add slots.
Yes, in my test, I found the memory situation is like this:
0-1325M: mirror (this scope contains tens of entries)
1532M-2303M: non-mirror
4G-128G: non-mirror
129G-154G: mirror
154G-231G: non-mirror
Thanks,
Chao Fan
>
>> static bool process_efi_entries(...)
>> {
>> ...
>> }
>> #else
>> static inline bool process_efi_entries(...)
>> {
>> return false;
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> Then:
>>
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI
>> > + process_efi_entries(minimum, image_size);
>> > + if (efi_mirror_found)
>> > + return slots_fetch_random();
>> > +#endif
>>
>> Can become:
>>
>> if (process_efi_entries(minimum, image_size))
>> return slots_fetch_random()
>>
>> and no #ifndef needed here.
>>
>> > +
>> > process_e820_entries(minimum, image_size);
>> > return slots_fetch_random();
>> > }
>> > @@ -652,7 +708,7 @@ void choose_random_location(unsigned long input,
>> > */
>> > min_addr = min(*output, 512UL << 20);
>> >
>> > - /* Walk e820 and find a random address. */
>> > + /* Walk available memory entries to find a random address. */
>> > random_addr = find_random_phys_addr(min_addr, output_size);
>> > if (!random_addr) {
>> > warn("Physical KASLR disabled: no suitable memory region!");
>> > --
>> > 2.5.5
>> >
>>
>> Otherwise, if the EFI logic is good, this looks sensible.
>>
>> Thanks for splitting up the patches!
>>
>> -Kees
>>
>> --
>> Kees Cook
>> Pixel Security
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-10 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-09 12:37 [PATCH v4 0/4] x86/boot/KASLR: Restrict kernel to be randomized in mirror regions Baoquan He
2017-07-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] x86/boot/KASLR: Wrap e820 entries walking code into new function process_e820_entries() Baoquan He
2017-07-09 14:00 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-18 10:45 ` [tip:x86/boot] " tip-bot for Baoquan He
2017-07-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] x86/boot/KASLR: Switch to pass struct mem_vector to process_e820_entry() Baoquan He
2017-07-09 14:02 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-18 10:45 ` [tip:x86/boot] " tip-bot for Baoquan He
2017-07-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] x86/boot/KASLR: Rename process_e820_entry() into process_mem_region() Baoquan He
2017-07-09 14:02 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-18 10:45 ` [tip:x86/boot] " tip-bot for Baoquan He
2017-07-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] x86/boot/KASLR: Restrict kernel to be randomized in mirror regions Baoquan He
2017-07-09 14:11 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-09 14:28 ` Baoquan He
2017-07-10 1:47 ` Baoquan He
2017-07-10 2:48 ` Chao Fan [this message]
2017-07-10 7:50 ` Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170710024848.GA27579@localhost.localdomain \
--to=fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thgarnie@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).