From: Okash Khawaja <okash.khawaja@gmail.com>
To: Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>,
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@gmail.com>,
Chris Brannon <chris@the-brannons.com>,
Kirk Reiser <kirk@reisers.ca>,
speakup@linux-speakup.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] Re: tty contention resulting from tty_open_by_device export
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 17:22:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170710162201.GB417@sanghar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170710123307.GA777@sanghar>
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:33:07PM +0100, Okash Khawaja wrote:
> > If the tty counts are being misreported then it would be better to fix
> > the code to actually manage the counts properly. The core tty code is
> > telling you that the tty is not in a valid state. While this is of
> > itself a good API to have, the underlying reference miscounting ought
> > IMHO to be fixed as well.
> When opening from kernel, we don't use file pointer. The count mismatch
> is between tty->count and #fd's. So opening from kernel leads to #fd's
> being less than tty->count. I thought this difference is relevant to
> user-space opening of tty, and not to kernel opening of tty. Can you
> suggest how to address this mismatch?
Idea is tty_kopen only ever returns a newly initialised tty - returned
by tty_init_dev. Since the access is exclusive, tty->count shouldn't
matter. When the caller is done with it, it calls tty_release_struct
which frees up the tty itself.
But yes, all the while a tty is kopened, its tty->count and #fds will be
unequal.
Thanks,
Okash
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-10 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-07 20:28 tty contention resulting from tty_open_by_device export Okash Khawaja
2017-07-08 8:38 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-07-08 9:01 ` Okash Khawaja
2017-07-09 11:41 ` [patch 0/3] " Okash Khawaja
2017-07-09 11:41 ` [patch 1/3] tty: resolve tty contention between kernel and user space Okash Khawaja
2017-07-09 11:51 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-07-09 15:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-07-09 19:08 ` Okash Khawaja
2017-07-10 8:31 ` Okash Khawaja
2017-07-10 15:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-07-10 16:12 ` Okash Khawaja
2017-07-09 11:41 ` [patch 2/3] staging: speakup: use tty_kopen instead of tty_open_by_driver Okash Khawaja
2017-07-09 11:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-07-09 12:28 ` Okash Khawaja
2017-07-09 11:41 ` [patch 3/3] tty: undo export " Okash Khawaja
2017-07-09 11:57 ` [patch 0/3] Re: tty contention resulting from tty_open_by_device export Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-07-09 12:32 ` [patch 4/3] tty: make tty_kopen return ENODEV in case of no TTY Okash Khawaja
2017-07-10 11:52 ` [patch 0/3] Re: tty contention resulting from tty_open_by_device export Alan Cox
2017-07-10 12:33 ` Okash Khawaja
2017-07-10 16:22 ` Okash Khawaja [this message]
2017-07-12 18:20 ` Alan Cox
2017-07-13 11:29 ` Okash Khawaja
2017-07-17 12:31 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-07-17 13:23 ` Okash Khawaja
2017-07-17 22:04 ` Alan Cox
2017-07-18 11:29 ` Okash Khawaja
2017-07-18 12:26 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-07-18 19:22 ` Okash Khawaja
2017-07-18 13:49 ` Alan Cox
2017-07-20 7:22 ` [patch v3 0/3] tty contention resulting from tty_open_by_driver export Okash Khawaja
2017-07-20 7:22 ` [patch v3 1/3] tty: resolve tty contention between kernel and user space Okash Khawaja
2017-07-20 7:22 ` [patch v3 2/3] staging: speakup: use tty_kopen and tty_kclose Okash Khawaja
2017-07-20 7:22 ` [patch v3 3/3] tty: undo export of tty_open_by_driver Okash Khawaja
2017-07-17 21:04 ` [patch v2 0/3] tty contention resulting from tty_open_by_driver export Okash Khawaja
2017-07-17 21:04 ` [patch v2 1/3] tty: resolve tty contention between kernel and user space Okash Khawaja
2017-07-17 21:04 ` [patch v2 2/3] staging: speakup: use tty_kopen instead of tty_open_by_driver Okash Khawaja
2017-07-17 21:04 ` [patch v2 3/3] tty: undo export " Okash Khawaja
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170710162201.GB417@sanghar \
--to=okash.khawaja@gmail.com \
--cc=chris@the-brannons.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=kirk@reisers.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
--cc=speakup@linux-speakup.org \
--cc=w.d.hubbs@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox