From: Daniel Scheller <d.scheller.oss@gmail.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ddbridge: constify i2c_algorithm structure
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 17:16:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170710171654.3b45ae08@audiostation.wuest.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170710011536.GA24235@embeddedgus>
Am Sun, 9 Jul 2017 20:15:36 -0500
schrieb "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com>:
> Check for i2c_algorithm structures that are only stored in
> the algo field of an i2c_adapter structure. This field is
> declared const, so i2c_algorithm structures that have this
> property can be declared as const also.
>
> This issue was identified using Coccinelle and the following
> semantic patch:
>
> @r disable optional_qualifier@
> identifier i;
> position p;
> @@
> static struct i2c_algorithm i@p = { ... };
>
> @ok@
> identifier r.i;
> struct i2c_adapter e;
> position p;
> @@
> e.algo = &i@p;
>
> @bad@
> position p != {r.p,ok.p};
> identifier r.i;
> @@
> i@p
>
> @depends on !bad disable optional_qualifier@
> identifier r.i;
> @@
> static
> +const
> struct i2c_algorithm i = { ... };
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/pci/ddbridge/ddbridge-core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/ddbridge/ddbridge-core.c
> b/drivers/media/pci/ddbridge/ddbridge-core.c index cd1723e..9663a4c
> 100644 --- a/drivers/media/pci/ddbridge/ddbridge-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/ddbridge/ddbridge-core.c
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static u32 ddb_i2c_functionality(struct
> i2c_adapter *adap) return I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL;
> }
>
> -static struct i2c_algorithm ddb_i2c_algo = {
> +static const struct i2c_algorithm ddb_i2c_algo = {
> .master_xfer = ddb_i2c_master_xfer,
> .functionality = ddb_i2c_functionality,
> };
Hi Gustavo,
Hi all,
please hold this single one patch from the constify patches back for
now, since we're in the process of bumping the whole driver to a newer
version which involves lots of code shuffling. With this, quite some
GIT rebasing work needs to be done, and adding this one liner at a
later time (thus rebasing it) is way easier.
To be sure this will not be forgotten afterwards, I've already posted a
patch applying the exact change at [1].
Thank you very much!
[1] https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/42393/
Best regards,
Daniel Scheller
--
https://github.com/herrnst
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-10 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-10 1:15 [PATCH] ddbridge: constify i2c_algorithm structure Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-07-10 15:16 ` Daniel Scheller [this message]
2017-07-17 4:10 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170710171654.3b45ae08@audiostation.wuest.de \
--to=d.scheller.oss@gmail.com \
--cc=garsilva@embeddedor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox