From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jaya Durga <rjdurga@gmail.com>
Cc: oleg.drokin@intel.com, andreas.dilger@intel.com,
jsimmons@infradead.org, john.hammond@intel.com,
bobijam@hotmail.com, mingo@kernel.org,
lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] Staging: lustre :lustre: include :lustre_compat.h: Prefer using the BIT macro
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:08:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170711170818.GA5013@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1499325195-17466-1-git-send-email-rjdurga@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 12:43:15PM +0530, Jaya Durga wrote:
> Replace all instances of (1 << 27) with BIT(27) to fix
> checkpatch check messages
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaya Durga <rjdurga@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_compat.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_compat.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_compat.h
> index da9ce19..686a251 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_compat.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_compat.h
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
> * set ATTR_BLOCKS to a high value to avoid any risk of collision with other
> * ATTR_* attributes (see bug 13828)
> */
> -#define ATTR_BLOCKS (1 << 27)
> +#define ATTR_BLOCKS BIT(27)
Isn't this used in lustre's userspace code? If so, you can't use the
BIT() macro there :(
Please check before you redo this.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-11 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-06 7:13 [PATCH 8/8] Staging: lustre :lustre: include :lustre_compat.h: Prefer using the BIT macro Jaya Durga
2017-07-06 7:23 ` Frans Klaver
2017-07-11 17:08 ` Greg KH [this message]
2017-07-12 5:13 ` Dilger, Andreas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170711170818.GA5013@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=bobijam@hotmail.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=john.hammond@intel.com \
--cc=jsimmons@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
--cc=rjdurga@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox