From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756211AbdGKRZw (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:25:52 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:59378 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756075AbdGKRZv (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:25:51 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:25:48 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Gaurav Pathak Cc: lkp@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joe@perches.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rts5208: Replace embedded function names with "%s: ", __func__ Message-ID: <20170711172548.GA5530@kroah.com> References: <201707070352.hKWHbngX%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <1499443150-6904-1-git-send-email-gauravpathak129@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1499443150-6904-1-git-send-email-gauravpathak129@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 09:29:10PM +0530, Gaurav Pathak wrote: > staging: rts5208: Avoid possible defects when refactoring. > > Signed-off-by: Gaurav Pathak > --- > drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c | 5 +++-- > drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c | 28 +++++++++++++++------------- > drivers/staging/rts5208/spi.c | 8 +++++--- > drivers/staging/rts5208/xd.c | 17 ++++++++++------- > 6 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) You sent two patches with the same subject, yet they are different. Which one am I supposed to pick? I'll drop both, please always properly version your patches when you resend them. thanks, greg k-h