From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Workaround for uPD72020x USB3 chips
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 10:26:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170713082640.GA6367@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170713031234.GD4486@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:12:34PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 04:52:28PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Ard and myself have just spent quite some time lately trying to pin
> > down an issue in the DMA code which was taking the form of a PCIe USB3
> > controller issuing a DMA access at some bizarre address, and being
> > caught red-handed by the IOMMU.
> >
> > After much head scratching and most of a week-end spent on tracing the
> > damn thing, I'm now convinced that the DMA code is fine, the XHCI
> > driver is correct, but that the HW (a Renesas uPD720202 chip) is a
> > nasty piece of work.
> >
> > The issue is as follow:
> >
> > - EFI initializes the controller using physical addresses above the
> > 4GB limit (this is on an arm64 box where the memory starts at
> > 0x80_00000000...).
> >
> > - The kernel takes over, sends a XHCI reset to the controller, and
> > because we have an IOMMU sitting between the controller and memory,
> > provides *virtual* addresses. Trying to make things a bit faster for
> > our controller, it issues IOVAs in the low 4GB range).
> >
> > - Low and behold, the controller is now issuing transactions with a
> > 0x80 prefix in front of our IOVA. Yes, the same prefix that was
> > programmed during the EFI configuration. IOMMU fault, not happy.
> >
> > If the kernel is hacked to only generate IOVAs that are more than
> > 32bit wide, the HW behaves correctly. The only way I can explain this
> > behaviour is that the HW latches the top 32bit of the ERST (it is
> > always the ERST IOVA that appears in my traces) in some internal
> > register, and that the XHCI reset fails to clear it. Writing zero in
> > the top bits is not enough to clear it either.
> >
> > So far, the only solution we have for this lovely piece of kit is to
> > force a PCI reset at probe time, which puts it right. The patches are
> > pretty ugly, but that's the best I could come up with so far.
> >
> > Tested on a pair of AMD Opteron 1100 boxes with Renesas uPD720201 and
> > uPD720202 controllers.
> >
> > Marc Zyngier (2):
> > PCI: Implement pci_reset_function_locked
> > usb: host: pci_quirks: Force hard reset of Renesas uPD72020x USB
> > controller
> >
> > drivers/pci/pci.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.h | 1 +
> > drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c | 7 +++++++
> > include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
> > 5 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
>
> I provisionally applied this to pci/virtualization. I'd like to have an
> XHCI ack before going further, though.
The xhci maintainer is on vacation, let's wait a week for him to get
back to get this. Given the long time that this has been broken on this
hardware, I think we can wait another week just fine :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-13 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-10 15:52 [PATCH 0/2] Workaround for uPD72020x USB3 chips Marc Zyngier
2017-07-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Implement pci_reset_function_locked Marc Zyngier
2017-07-10 15:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] usb: host: pci_quirks: Force hard reset of Renesas uPD72020x USB controller Marc Zyngier
2017-07-17 12:02 ` Mathias Nyman
2017-07-10 17:21 ` [PATCH 0/2] Workaround for uPD72020x USB3 chips Ard Biesheuvel
2017-07-12 19:04 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-07-13 3:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-07-13 6:48 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-07-13 7:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-07-13 11:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-07-13 12:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-07-13 8:26 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2017-07-13 11:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-01 21:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-01 21:53 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-02 1:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170713082640.GA6367@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox