From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753853AbdGNJwe (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:52:34 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:55744 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753302AbdGNJwc (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:52:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:52:27 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: "kernelci.org bot" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/25] 4.9.38-stable review Message-ID: <20170714095227.GE2269@kroah.com> References: <20170713154001.535209166@linuxfoundation.org> <5967dc72.7187df0a.f1fb5.37a1@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5967dc72.7187df0a.f1fb5.37a1@mx.google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 01:47:46PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote: > stable-rc/linux-4.9.y boot: 246 boots: 6 failed, 237 passed with 2 offline, 1 conflict (v4.9.37-26-g996828f64cac) Are these 6 failures "ok" to ignore? thanks, greg k-h