* [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: constify attribute_group structures. @ 2017-07-17 9:25 Arvind Yadav 2017-07-17 10:45 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Arvind Yadav @ 2017-07-17 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: david.kershner, Timothy.Sell, bryan.thompson, jon.frisch, david.binder, sparmaintainer Cc: devel, linux-kernel attribute_groups are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions working with attribute_groups provided by <linux/sysfs.h> work with const attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const. Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> --- drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c index 1c785dd..bba10dc 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c +++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static ssize_t typename_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, NULL }; -static struct attribute_group channel_attr_grp = { +static const struct attribute_group channel_attr_grp = { .name = "channel", .attrs = channel_attrs, }; @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static ssize_t channel_id_show(struct device *dev, NULL }; -static struct attribute_group dev_attr_grp = { +static const struct attribute_group dev_attr_grp = { .attrs = dev_attrs, }; diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c index 2215056..798a92e 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c +++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c @@ -1146,7 +1146,7 @@ static ssize_t deviceenabled_store(struct device *dev, NULL }; -static struct attribute_group visorchipset_parahotplug_group = { +static const struct attribute_group visorchipset_parahotplug_group = { .name = "parahotplug", .attrs = visorchipset_parahotplug_attrs }; -- 1.9.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: constify attribute_group structures. 2017-07-17 9:25 [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: constify attribute_group structures Arvind Yadav @ 2017-07-17 10:45 ` Greg KH 2017-07-17 12:13 ` Arvind Yadav 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2017-07-17 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arvind Yadav Cc: david.kershner, Timothy.Sell, bryan.thompson, jon.frisch, david.binder, sparmaintainer, devel, linux-kernel On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 02:55:37PM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote: > attribute_groups are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions > working with attribute_groups provided by <linux/sysfs.h> work > with const attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const. > > Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Why not just use the ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() macro for these? Or is there something that is preventing that? thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: constify attribute_group structures. 2017-07-17 10:45 ` Greg KH @ 2017-07-17 12:13 ` Arvind Yadav 2017-07-17 12:37 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Arvind Yadav @ 2017-07-17 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH Cc: david.kershner, Timothy.Sell, bryan.thompson, jon.frisch, david.binder, sparmaintainer, devel, linux-kernel Hi Greg, On Monday 17 July 2017 04:15 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 02:55:37PM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote: >> attribute_groups are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions >> working with attribute_groups provided by <linux/sysfs.h> work >> with const attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const. >> >> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> >> --- >> drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c | 4 ++-- >> drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > Why not just use the ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() macro for these? Or is there > something that is preventing that? Yes, we can use. if we are only initializing '.attrs'. ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() will not work if we will initialize other member of attribute_group like 'bin_attrs', 'is_visible', and 'name'. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Thanks, ~arvind ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: constify attribute_group structures. 2017-07-17 12:13 ` Arvind Yadav @ 2017-07-17 12:37 ` Greg KH 2017-07-17 21:36 ` Kershner, David A 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2017-07-17 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arvind Yadav Cc: david.kershner, Timothy.Sell, bryan.thompson, jon.frisch, david.binder, sparmaintainer, devel, linux-kernel On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:43:14PM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote: > Hi Greg, > > > On Monday 17 July 2017 04:15 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 02:55:37PM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote: > > > attribute_groups are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions > > > working with attribute_groups provided by <linux/sysfs.h> work > > > with const attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c | 4 ++-- > > > drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c | 2 +- > > > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Why not just use the ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() macro for these? Or is there > > something that is preventing that? > Yes, we can use. if we are only initializing '.attrs'. > ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() will not work if we will initialize other member of > attribute_group like 'bin_attrs', 'is_visible', and 'name'. That means you should redo this patch :) Also, your changelog text had a typo, it is "attribute_group", not "attribute_groups". thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: constify attribute_group structures. 2017-07-17 12:37 ` Greg KH @ 2017-07-17 21:36 ` Kershner, David A 2017-07-18 5:05 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Kershner, David A @ 2017-07-17 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH, Arvind Yadav Cc: Sell, Timothy C, Thompson, Bryan E., jon.frisch@unisys.com, Binder, David Anthony, *S-Par-Maintainer, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com] > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 8:38 AM > To: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> > Cc: Kershner, David A <David.Kershner@unisys.com>; Sell, Timothy C > <Timothy.Sell@unisys.com>; Thompson, Bryan E. > <bryan.thompson@unisys.com>; jon.frisch@unisys.com; Binder, David > Anthony <David.Binder@unisys.com>; *S-Par-Maintainer > <SParMaintainer@unisys.com>; devel@driverdev.osuosl.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: constify attribute_group > structures. > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:43:14PM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > On Monday 17 July 2017 04:15 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 02:55:37PM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote: > > > > attribute_groups are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions > > > > working with attribute_groups provided by <linux/sysfs.h> work > > > > with const attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c | 4 ++-- > > > > drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c | 2 +- > > > > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > Why not just use the ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() macro for these? Or is there > > > something that is preventing that? > > Yes, we can use. if we are only initializing '.attrs'. > > ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() will not work if we will initialize other member of > > attribute_group like 'bin_attrs', 'is_visible', and 'name'. > > That means you should redo this patch :) > > Also, your changelog text had a typo, it is "attribute_group", not > "attribute_groups". > Greg, are you recommending that we shouldn't be setting the attribute_group .name field? What does it pick up if we don't specify it? Also, for our attribute_groups in visorchipset, we are defining it with two different attribute_group variables. Are you allowed to use two different attribute_group variables in an attribute_groups, or is this frowned upon and we should flatten it out to just one? An example that we used in the kernel was: static const struct attribute_group *l2_cache_pmu_attr_grps[] = { &l2_cache_pmu_format_group, &l2_cache_pmu_cpumask_group, NULL, }; Thanks, David Kershner > thanks, > > greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: constify attribute_group structures. 2017-07-17 21:36 ` Kershner, David A @ 2017-07-18 5:05 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2017-07-18 5:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kershner, David A Cc: Arvind Yadav, Sell, Timothy C, Thompson, Bryan E., jon.frisch@unisys.com, Binder, David Anthony, *S-Par-Maintainer, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 09:36:58PM +0000, Kershner, David A wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com] > > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 8:38 AM > > To: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> > > Cc: Kershner, David A <David.Kershner@unisys.com>; Sell, Timothy C > > <Timothy.Sell@unisys.com>; Thompson, Bryan E. > > <bryan.thompson@unisys.com>; jon.frisch@unisys.com; Binder, David > > Anthony <David.Binder@unisys.com>; *S-Par-Maintainer > > <SParMaintainer@unisys.com>; devel@driverdev.osuosl.org; linux- > > kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: constify attribute_group > > structures. Why is this in your email body? > > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:43:14PM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote: > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > > > > On Monday 17 July 2017 04:15 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 02:55:37PM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote: > > > > > attribute_groups are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions > > > > > working with attribute_groups provided by <linux/sysfs.h> work > > > > > with const attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c | 4 ++-- > > > > > drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c | 2 +- > > > > > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > Why not just use the ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() macro for these? Or is there > > > > something that is preventing that? > > > Yes, we can use. if we are only initializing '.attrs'. > > > ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() will not work if we will initialize other member of > > > attribute_group like 'bin_attrs', 'is_visible', and 'name'. > > > > That means you should redo this patch :) > > > > Also, your changelog text had a typo, it is "attribute_group", not > > "attribute_groups". > > > > Greg, are you recommending that we shouldn't be setting the attribute_group > .name field? What does it pick up if we don't specify it? Why do you want a name for your group? Anyway, yes, you are right, if you set a .name, then you can't use the macro, my fault, I hadn't looked at it in a long time. > Also, for our attribute_groups in visorchipset, we are defining it with two > different attribute_group variables. Are you allowed to use two different > attribute_group variables in an attribute_groups, or is this frowned upon and > we should flatten it out to just one? An example that we used in the kernel was: > > static const struct attribute_group *l2_cache_pmu_attr_grps[] = { > &l2_cache_pmu_format_group, > &l2_cache_pmu_cpumask_group, > NULL, > }; Nah, that's fine, sorry for the noise. But the changelog text still should be fixed so I can take this. thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-07-18 5:05 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-07-17 9:25 [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: constify attribute_group structures Arvind Yadav 2017-07-17 10:45 ` Greg KH 2017-07-17 12:13 ` Arvind Yadav 2017-07-17 12:37 ` Greg KH 2017-07-17 21:36 ` Kershner, David A 2017-07-18 5:05 ` Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox