public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: constify attribute_group structures.
@ 2017-07-17  9:25 Arvind Yadav
  2017-07-17 10:45 ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arvind Yadav @ 2017-07-17  9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: david.kershner, Timothy.Sell, bryan.thompson, jon.frisch,
	david.binder, sparmaintainer
  Cc: devel, linux-kernel

attribute_groups are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions
working with attribute_groups provided by <linux/sysfs.h> work
with const attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c | 4 ++--
 drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c  | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c
index 1c785dd..bba10dc 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static ssize_t typename_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
 		NULL
 };
 
-static struct attribute_group channel_attr_grp = {
+static const struct attribute_group channel_attr_grp = {
 		.name = "channel",
 		.attrs = channel_attrs,
 };
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static ssize_t channel_id_show(struct device *dev,
 		NULL
 };
 
-static struct attribute_group dev_attr_grp = {
+static const struct attribute_group dev_attr_grp = {
 		.attrs = dev_attrs,
 };
 
diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c
index 2215056..798a92e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c
@@ -1146,7 +1146,7 @@ static ssize_t deviceenabled_store(struct device *dev,
 	NULL
 };
 
-static struct attribute_group visorchipset_parahotplug_group = {
+static const struct attribute_group visorchipset_parahotplug_group = {
 	.name = "parahotplug",
 	.attrs = visorchipset_parahotplug_attrs
 };
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: constify attribute_group structures.
  2017-07-17  9:25 [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: constify attribute_group structures Arvind Yadav
@ 2017-07-17 10:45 ` Greg KH
  2017-07-17 12:13   ` Arvind Yadav
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2017-07-17 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arvind Yadav
  Cc: david.kershner, Timothy.Sell, bryan.thompson, jon.frisch,
	david.binder, sparmaintainer, devel, linux-kernel

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 02:55:37PM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> attribute_groups are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions
> working with attribute_groups provided by <linux/sysfs.h> work
> with const attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c | 4 ++--
>  drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c  | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Why not just use the ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() macro for these?  Or is there
something that is preventing that?

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: constify attribute_group structures.
  2017-07-17 10:45 ` Greg KH
@ 2017-07-17 12:13   ` Arvind Yadav
  2017-07-17 12:37     ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arvind Yadav @ 2017-07-17 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg KH
  Cc: david.kershner, Timothy.Sell, bryan.thompson, jon.frisch,
	david.binder, sparmaintainer, devel, linux-kernel

Hi Greg,


On Monday 17 July 2017 04:15 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 02:55:37PM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
>> attribute_groups are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions
>> working with attribute_groups provided by <linux/sysfs.h> work
>> with const attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c | 4 ++--
>>   drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c  | 2 +-
>>   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> Why not just use the ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() macro for these?  Or is there
> something that is preventing that?
Yes, we can use. if we are only initializing '.attrs'.
ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() will not work if we will initialize other member of
attribute_group like 'bin_attrs', 'is_visible', and  'name'.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Thanks,
~arvind

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: constify attribute_group structures.
  2017-07-17 12:13   ` Arvind Yadav
@ 2017-07-17 12:37     ` Greg KH
  2017-07-17 21:36       ` Kershner, David A
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2017-07-17 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arvind Yadav
  Cc: david.kershner, Timothy.Sell, bryan.thompson, jon.frisch,
	david.binder, sparmaintainer, devel, linux-kernel

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:43:14PM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> 
> On Monday 17 July 2017 04:15 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 02:55:37PM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> > > attribute_groups are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions
> > > working with attribute_groups provided by <linux/sysfs.h> work
> > > with const attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c | 4 ++--
> > >   drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c  | 2 +-
> > >   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > Why not just use the ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() macro for these?  Or is there
> > something that is preventing that?
> Yes, we can use. if we are only initializing '.attrs'.
> ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() will not work if we will initialize other member of
> attribute_group like 'bin_attrs', 'is_visible', and  'name'.

That means you should redo this patch :)

Also, your changelog text had a typo, it is "attribute_group", not
"attribute_groups".

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: constify attribute_group structures.
  2017-07-17 12:37     ` Greg KH
@ 2017-07-17 21:36       ` Kershner, David A
  2017-07-18  5:05         ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kershner, David A @ 2017-07-17 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg KH, Arvind Yadav
  Cc: Sell, Timothy C, Thompson, Bryan E., jon.frisch@unisys.com,
	Binder, David Anthony, *S-Par-Maintainer,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 8:38 AM
> To: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
> Cc: Kershner, David A <David.Kershner@unisys.com>; Sell, Timothy C
> <Timothy.Sell@unisys.com>; Thompson, Bryan E.
> <bryan.thompson@unisys.com>; jon.frisch@unisys.com; Binder, David
> Anthony <David.Binder@unisys.com>; *S-Par-Maintainer
> <SParMaintainer@unisys.com>; devel@driverdev.osuosl.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: constify attribute_group
> structures.
> 
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:43:14PM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> >
> > On Monday 17 July 2017 04:15 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 02:55:37PM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> > > > attribute_groups are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions
> > > > working with attribute_groups provided by <linux/sysfs.h> work
> > > > with const attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >   drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c | 4 ++--
> > > >   drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c  | 2 +-
> > > >   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > Why not just use the ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() macro for these?  Or is there
> > > something that is preventing that?
> > Yes, we can use. if we are only initializing '.attrs'.
> > ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() will not work if we will initialize other member of
> > attribute_group like 'bin_attrs', 'is_visible', and  'name'.
> 
> That means you should redo this patch :)
> 
> Also, your changelog text had a typo, it is "attribute_group", not
> "attribute_groups".
> 

Greg, are you recommending that we shouldn't be setting the attribute_group
.name field? What does it pick up if we don't specify it?

Also, for our attribute_groups in visorchipset, we are defining it with two
different attribute_group variables. Are you allowed to use two different
attribute_group variables in an attribute_groups, or is this frowned upon and
we should flatten it out to just one? An example that we used in the kernel was:

	static const struct attribute_group *l2_cache_pmu_attr_grps[] = {
		&l2_cache_pmu_format_group,
		&l2_cache_pmu_cpumask_group,
		NULL,
	};

Thanks,
David Kershner

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: constify attribute_group structures.
  2017-07-17 21:36       ` Kershner, David A
@ 2017-07-18  5:05         ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2017-07-18  5:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kershner, David A
  Cc: Arvind Yadav, Sell, Timothy C, Thompson, Bryan E.,
	jon.frisch@unisys.com, Binder, David Anthony, *S-Par-Maintainer,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 09:36:58PM +0000, Kershner, David A wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com]
> > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 8:38 AM
> > To: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Kershner, David A <David.Kershner@unisys.com>; Sell, Timothy C
> > <Timothy.Sell@unisys.com>; Thompson, Bryan E.
> > <bryan.thompson@unisys.com>; jon.frisch@unisys.com; Binder, David
> > Anthony <David.Binder@unisys.com>; *S-Par-Maintainer
> > <SParMaintainer@unisys.com>; devel@driverdev.osuosl.org; linux-
> > kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: constify attribute_group
> > structures.

Why is this in your email body?

> > 
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:43:14PM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > >
> > > On Monday 17 July 2017 04:15 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 02:55:37PM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> > > > > attribute_groups are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions
> > > > > working with attribute_groups provided by <linux/sysfs.h> work
> > > > > with const attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >   drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c | 4 ++--
> > > > >   drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c  | 2 +-
> > > > >   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > Why not just use the ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() macro for these?  Or is there
> > > > something that is preventing that?
> > > Yes, we can use. if we are only initializing '.attrs'.
> > > ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() will not work if we will initialize other member of
> > > attribute_group like 'bin_attrs', 'is_visible', and  'name'.
> > 
> > That means you should redo this patch :)
> > 
> > Also, your changelog text had a typo, it is "attribute_group", not
> > "attribute_groups".
> > 
> 
> Greg, are you recommending that we shouldn't be setting the attribute_group
> .name field? What does it pick up if we don't specify it?

Why do you want a name for your group?  Anyway, yes, you are right, if
you set a .name, then you can't use the macro, my fault, I hadn't looked
at it in a long time.

> Also, for our attribute_groups in visorchipset, we are defining it with two
> different attribute_group variables. Are you allowed to use two different
> attribute_group variables in an attribute_groups, or is this frowned upon and
> we should flatten it out to just one? An example that we used in the kernel was:
> 
> 	static const struct attribute_group *l2_cache_pmu_attr_grps[] = {
> 		&l2_cache_pmu_format_group,
> 		&l2_cache_pmu_cpumask_group,
> 		NULL,
> 	};

Nah, that's fine, sorry for the noise.  But the changelog text still
should be fixed so I can take this.

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-07-18  5:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-07-17  9:25 [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: constify attribute_group structures Arvind Yadav
2017-07-17 10:45 ` Greg KH
2017-07-17 12:13   ` Arvind Yadav
2017-07-17 12:37     ` Greg KH
2017-07-17 21:36       ` Kershner, David A
2017-07-18  5:05         ` Greg KH

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox