Re: [PATCH 5/6] cgroup: implement cgroup v2 thread support

Tejun Heo
2017-07-18T18:47:22Z

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 08:41:35PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:54:56PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> > Okay, we're kinda off the rails now. Just to verify that we're on the
> > same page, are you also saying that the following should be a valid
> > configuration?
> >
> > R (D)
> > |
> > A (D and has processes in it and controllers enabled)
> > |
> > C (D and has processes in it)
> >
>
> Argh, the no internal process thing again -- I completely forgot about
> that :-(

Heh, yeah, we wouldn't be talking about all these otherwise. The
restriction is pain in the ass but at the same time useful for
full(er)-scope resource control. Were there other things that caught
your eyes?

Thanks.

--
tejun