From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: lizefan@huawei.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com,
luto@amacapital.net, efault@gmx.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, guro@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] cgroup: implement cgroup v2 thread support
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:40:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170719154046.GN3365493@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <199bfed8-de84-da6d-6623-c45524443aaa@redhat.com>
Hello, Waiman.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:12:31PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> > +Marking a cgroup threaded makes it join the resource domain of its
> > +parent as a threaded cgroup. The parent may be another threaded
> > +cgroup whose resource domain is further up in the hierarchy. The root
> > +of a threaded subtree, that is, the nearest ancestor which is not
> > +threaded, is called threaded domain and serves as the resource domain
> > +for the entire subtree.
>
> The cgroup code uses the term "thread root" in quite a number of places.
> So a developer may be confused when comparing the code and the
> documentation. I would recommend either introducing "thread root" as an
> alias for threaded domain here in the documentation or documenting that
> "threaded domain = thread root" in the code.
Yeah, I was a bit hesitant to introduce an extra term for it, but both
terms make sense and thread root is less cumbersome. I'll incorporate
it into the doc.
> > cgroup.procs
> > A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
> > all cgroups.
>
> Do we need to document that cgroup.procs isn't writable in a threaded
> cgroup?
Yeah, will update.
> > @@ -4301,6 +4606,7 @@ static struct cgroup *cgroup_create(struct cgroup *parent)
> > cgrp->self.parent = &parent->self;
> > cgrp->root = root;
> > cgrp->level = level;
> > + cgrp->dom_cgrp = cgrp->dom_cgrp;
>
> It is a no-op. I think it is better to modify it to
>
> + cgrp->dom_cgrp = cgroup_is_threaded(parent) ? parent->dom_cgrp : cgrp;
>
> Then we won't have an invalid domain state.
I'll respond to this on the other sub-thread.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-19 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-17 2:07 [PATCHSET for-4.13] cgroup: implement cgroup2 thread mode, v3 Tejun Heo
2017-07-17 2:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] cgroup: reorganize cgroup.procs / task write path Tejun Heo
2017-07-17 2:07 ` [PATCH 2/6] cgroup: add @flags to css_task_iter_start() and implement CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS Tejun Heo
2017-07-17 2:07 ` [PATCH 3/6] cgroup: introduce cgroup->dom_cgrp and threaded css_set handling Tejun Heo
2017-07-17 2:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] cgroup: implement CSS_TASK_ITER_THREADED Tejun Heo
2017-07-17 2:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] cgroup: implement cgroup v2 thread support Tejun Heo
2017-07-17 14:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-17 14:26 ` Tejun Heo
2017-07-18 17:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-18 17:35 ` Waiman Long
2017-07-18 17:54 ` Tejun Heo
2017-07-18 18:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-18 18:47 ` Tejun Heo
2017-07-19 14:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-19 16:34 ` Tejun Heo
2017-07-17 20:56 ` Waiman Long
2017-07-18 14:37 ` Waiman Long
2017-07-18 17:10 ` Tejun Heo
2017-07-18 17:23 ` Waiman Long
2017-07-19 16:29 ` Tejun Heo
2017-07-19 17:09 ` Waiman Long
2017-07-19 17:48 ` Tejun Heo
2017-07-17 21:12 ` Waiman Long
2017-07-19 15:40 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2017-07-17 2:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] cgroup: update debug controller to print out thread mode information Tejun Heo
2017-07-17 21:19 ` Waiman Long
2017-07-19 15:31 ` Tejun Heo
2017-07-19 15:41 ` Waiman Long
2017-07-19 15:44 ` Tejun Heo
2017-07-17 14:48 ` [PATCHSET for-4.13] cgroup: implement cgroup2 thread mode, v3 Waiman Long
2017-07-17 14:51 ` Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-07-19 19:44 [PATCHSET for-4.13] cgroup: implement cgroup2 thread mode, v4 Tejun Heo
2017-07-19 19:44 ` [PATCH 5/6] cgroup: implement cgroup v2 thread support Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170719154046.GN3365493@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox