From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf: Fix locking for children siblings group read
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 16:14:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170720141455.2106-1-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
We're missing ctx lock when iterating children siblings
within the perf_read path for group reading. Following
race and crash can happen:
User space doing read syscall on event group leader:
T1:
perf_read
lock event->ctx->mutex
perf_read_group
lock leader->child_mutex
__perf_read_group_add(child)
list_for_each_entry(sub, &leader->sibling_list, group_entry)
----> sub might be invalid at this point, because it could
get removed via perf_event_exit_task_context in T2
Child exiting and cleaning up its events:
T2:
perf_event_exit_task_context
lock ctx->mutex
list_for_each_entry_safe(child_event, next, &child_ctx->event_list,...
perf_event_exit_event(child)
lock ctx->lock
perf_group_detach(child)
unlock ctx->lock
----> child is removed from sibling_list without any sync
with T1 path above
...
free_event(child)
Before the child is removed from the leader's child_list,
(and thus is omitted from perf_read_group processing), we
need to ensure that perf_read_group touches child's
siblings under its ctx->lock.
Tested-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 9747e422ab20..585955b41489 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -4365,7 +4365,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_event_read_value);
static int __perf_read_group_add(struct perf_event *leader,
u64 read_format, u64 *values)
{
+ struct perf_event_context *ctx = leader->ctx;
struct perf_event *sub;
+ unsigned long flags;
int n = 1; /* skip @nr */
int ret;
@@ -4395,12 +4397,15 @@ static int __perf_read_group_add(struct perf_event *leader,
if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_ID)
values[n++] = primary_event_id(leader);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags);
+
list_for_each_entry(sub, &leader->sibling_list, group_entry) {
values[n++] += perf_event_count(sub);
if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_ID)
values[n++] = primary_event_id(sub);
}
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
return 0;
}
--
2.9.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-07-20 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-20 14:14 Jiri Olsa [this message]
2017-07-20 14:41 ` [PATCH] perf: Fix locking for children siblings group read Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-21 9:37 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/core: " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170720141455.2106-1-jolsa@kernel.org \
--to=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox