From: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Cc: eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
christoffer.dall@linaro.org, drjones@redhat.com, wei@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: restructure kvm_vgic_(un)map_phys_irq
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 13:44:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170721114439.GE16350@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1497531160-29162-5-git-send-email-eric.auger@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 02:52:36PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> We want to reuse the core of the map/unmap functions for IRQ
> forwarding. Let's move the computation of the hwirq in
> kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq and pass the linux IRQ as parameter.
> the host_irq is added to struct vgic_irq.
>
> We introduce kvm_vgic_map/unmap_irq which take a struct vgic_irq
> handle as a parameter.
So this is to avoid the linux-to-hardware irq number translation in
other callers?
I am sort of guessing that we need to store the host_irq number so that
we can probe into the physical GIC in later patches? That may be good
to note in this commit message if you respin.
Thanks,
-Christoffer
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 8 ++++---
> virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c | 24 +------------------
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> index ef71858..cceb31d 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ struct vgic_irq {
> bool hw; /* Tied to HW IRQ */
> struct kref refcount; /* Used for LPIs */
> u32 hwintid; /* HW INTID number */
> + unsigned int host_irq; /* linux irq corresponding to hwintid */
> union {
> u8 targets; /* GICv2 target VCPUs mask */
> u32 mpidr; /* GICv3 target VCPU */
> @@ -301,9 +302,10 @@ int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
> bool level);
> int kvm_vgic_inject_mapped_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
> bool level);
> -int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 virt_irq, u32 phys_irq);
> -int kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int virt_irq);
> -bool kvm_vgic_map_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int virt_irq);
> +int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int host_irq,
> + u32 vintid);
> +int kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int vintid);
> +bool kvm_vgic_map_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int vintid);
>
> int kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> index 5976609..57a30ab 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> @@ -617,9 +617,6 @@ int kvm_timer_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct arch_timer_cpu *timer = &vcpu->arch.timer_cpu;
> struct arch_timer_context *vtimer = vcpu_vtimer(vcpu);
> - struct irq_desc *desc;
> - struct irq_data *data;
> - int phys_irq;
> int ret;
>
> if (timer->enabled)
> @@ -632,26 +629,7 @@ int kvm_timer_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (!vgic_initialized(vcpu->kvm))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - /*
> - * Find the physical IRQ number corresponding to the host_vtimer_irq
> - */
> - desc = irq_to_desc(host_vtimer_irq);
> - if (!desc) {
> - kvm_err("%s: no interrupt descriptor\n", __func__);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> - data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> - while (data->parent_data)
> - data = data->parent_data;
> -
> - phys_irq = data->hwirq;
> -
> - /*
> - * Tell the VGIC that the virtual interrupt is tied to a
> - * physical interrupt. We do that once per VCPU.
> - */
> - ret = kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(vcpu, vtimer->irq.irq, phys_irq);
> + ret = kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(vcpu, host_vtimer_irq, vtimer->irq.irq);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> index 83b24d2..075f073 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
> #include <linux/kvm.h>
> #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> #include <linux/list_sort.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
>
> #include "vgic.h"
>
> @@ -392,38 +394,66 @@ int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 virt_irq, u32 phys_irq)
> +/* @irq->irq_lock must be held */
> +static int kvm_vgic_map_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_irq *irq,
> + unsigned int host_irq)
> {
> - struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, virt_irq);
> + struct irq_desc *desc;
> + struct irq_data *data;
>
> - BUG_ON(!irq);
> -
> - spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
> + /*
> + * Find the physical IRQ number corresponding to @host_irq
> + */
> + desc = irq_to_desc(host_irq);
> + if (!desc) {
> + kvm_err("%s: no interrupt descriptor\n", __func__);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> + while (data->parent_data)
> + data = data->parent_data;
>
> irq->hw = true;
> - irq->hwintid = phys_irq;
> + irq->host_irq = host_irq;
> + irq->hwintid = data->hwirq;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* @irq->irq_lock must be held */
> +static inline void kvm_vgic_unmap_irq(struct vgic_irq *irq)
> +{
> + irq->hw = false;
> + irq->hwintid = 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int host_irq,
> + u32 vintid)
> +{
> + struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, vintid);
> + int ret;
>
> + BUG_ON(!irq);
> +
> + spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
> + ret = kvm_vgic_map_irq(vcpu, irq, host_irq);
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
>
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> -int kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int virt_irq)
> +int kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int vintid)
> {
> struct vgic_irq *irq;
>
> if (!vgic_initialized(vcpu->kvm))
> return -EAGAIN;
>
> - irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, virt_irq);
> + irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, vintid);
> BUG_ON(!irq);
>
> spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
> -
> - irq->hw = false;
> - irq->hwintid = 0;
> -
> + kvm_vgic_unmap_irq(irq);
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
>
> @@ -726,9 +756,9 @@ void vgic_kick_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm)
> }
> }
>
> -bool kvm_vgic_map_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int virt_irq)
> +bool kvm_vgic_map_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int vintid)
> {
> - struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, virt_irq);
> + struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, vintid);
> bool map_is_active;
>
> spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
> --
> 2.5.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-21 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-15 12:52 [PATCH v2 0/8] ARM/ARM64 Direct EOI setup for VFIO platform interrupts Eric Auger
2017-06-15 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] VFIO: platform: Differentiate auto-masking from user masking Eric Auger
2017-06-15 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] VFIO: platform: Introduce direct EOI interrupt handler Eric Auger
2017-06-15 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] VFIO: platform: Direct EOI irq bypass for ARM/ARM64 Eric Auger
2017-06-15 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: restructure kvm_vgic_(un)map_phys_irq Eric Auger
2017-07-21 11:44 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2017-08-22 14:33 ` Auger Eric
2017-06-15 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Handle mapped level sensitive SPIs Eric Auger
2017-07-04 12:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-07-07 7:41 ` Auger Eric
2017-07-21 13:03 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-25 13:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-07-25 14:48 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-25 15:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-07-26 9:37 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-22 14:35 ` Auger Eric
2017-08-24 14:56 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-23 7:25 ` Auger Eric
2017-07-21 12:11 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-22 14:33 ` Auger Eric
2017-08-29 6:45 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-29 6:58 ` Auger Eric
2017-06-15 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Implement forwarding setting Eric Auger
2017-07-21 13:13 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-23 8:58 ` Auger Eric
2017-08-29 7:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-06-15 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] virt: irqbypass: Add a type field to the irqbypass producer Eric Auger
2017-06-15 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] KVM: arm/arm64: register DEOI irq bypass consumer on ARM/ARM64 Eric Auger
2017-07-21 13:25 ` Christoffer Dall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170721114439.GE16350@cbox \
--to=cdall@linaro.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=wei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).