From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] net-next: add a dma_desc element to struct skb_shared_info
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 22:37:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170721203753.GA26175@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6bcc6463-c2e7-5f56-22b0-f49bb369ce1c@phrozen.org>
John Crispin <john@phrozen.org> wrote:
> When the flow offloading engine forwards a packet to the DMA it will send
> additional info to the sw path. this includes
> * physical switch port
> * internal flow hash - this is required to populate the correct flow table
> entry
> * ppe state - this indicates what state the PPEs internal table is in for
> the flow
> * the reason why the packet was forwarde - these are things like bind,
> unbind, timed out, ...
>
> once the flow table offloading patches are ready and upstream, the netfilter
> layer will see the SKB and pass it o to the flow table offloading code,
If this is about conntrack offloading, then I prefer if this is done
without changing any core network structure.
What about adding a new conntrack extension to hold whatever info
you need, and then allocate a conntrack entry in the driver?
This would obviously need core changes in conntrack (such as allowing
calls into conntrack from drivers without hard module dependencies,
and a thorough check if this causes backwards problems (e.g.
right now a "-m conntrack" check in the raw table can only succeed for
packets from lo interface).
But I think that could be worked around, esp. if we assume that we
won't see such entries a lot (assuming sw is slowpath and hw handles
most packets).
Thanks,
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-21 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-21 15:20 [RFC 0/2] net-next: hw flow offloading John Crispin
2017-07-21 15:20 ` [RFC 1/2] net-next: add a dma_desc element to struct skb_shared_info John Crispin
2017-07-21 15:56 ` Paolo Abeni
2017-07-21 17:01 ` John Crispin
2017-07-21 19:21 ` David Miller
2017-07-21 20:37 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2017-07-21 15:20 ` [RFC 2/2] net-next: mediatek: populate the shared John Crispin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170721203753.GA26175@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=john@phrozen.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox