From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 09:24:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170725162454.GP3730@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170725042701.awyqowhgc6s3r44h@tardis>
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:27:01PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 02:58:16PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > The sys_membarrier() system call has proven too slow for some use
> > cases, which has prompted users to instead rely on TLB shootdown.
> > Although TLB shootdown is much faster, it has the slight disadvantage
> > of not working at all on arm and arm64. This commit therefore adds
> > an expedited option to the sys_membarrier() system call.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > include/uapi/linux/membarrier.h | 11 +++++++++++
> > kernel/membarrier.c | 7 ++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/membarrier.h b/include/uapi/linux/membarrier.h
> > index e0b108bd2624..ba36d8a6be61 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/membarrier.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/membarrier.h
> > @@ -40,6 +40,16 @@
> > * (non-running threads are de facto in such a
> > * state). This covers threads from all processes
> > * running on the system. This command returns 0.
> > + * @MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED: Execute a memory barrier on all
> > + * running threads, but in an expedited fashion.
> > + * Upon return from system call, the caller thread
> > + * is ensured that all running threads have passed
> > + * through a state where all memory accesses to
> > + * user-space addresses match program order between
> > + * entry to and return from the system call
> > + * (non-running threads are de facto in such a
> > + * state). This covers threads from all processes
> > + * running on the system. This command returns 0.
> > *
> > * Command to be passed to the membarrier system call. The commands need to
> > * be a single bit each, except for MEMBARRIER_CMD_QUERY which is assigned to
> > @@ -48,6 +58,7 @@
> > enum membarrier_cmd {
> > MEMBARRIER_CMD_QUERY = 0,
> > MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED = (1 << 0),
> > + MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED = (2 << 0),
>
> Should this better be "(1 << 1)" ;-)
Same value, but yes, much more aligned with the intent. Good catch,
thank you, fixed!
Thanx, Paul
> Regards,
> Boqun
>
> > };
> >
> > #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_MEMBARRIER_H */
> > diff --git a/kernel/membarrier.c b/kernel/membarrier.c
> > index 9f9284f37f8d..b749c39bb219 100644
> > --- a/kernel/membarrier.c
> > +++ b/kernel/membarrier.c
> > @@ -22,7 +22,8 @@
> > * Bitmask made from a "or" of all commands within enum membarrier_cmd,
> > * except MEMBARRIER_CMD_QUERY.
> > */
> > -#define MEMBARRIER_CMD_BITMASK (MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED)
> > +#define MEMBARRIER_CMD_BITMASK (MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED | \
> > + MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED)
> >
> > /**
> > * sys_membarrier - issue memory barriers on a set of threads
> > @@ -64,6 +65,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(membarrier, int, cmd, int, flags)
> > if (num_online_cpus() > 1)
> > synchronize_sched();
> > return 0;
> > + case MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED:
> > + if (num_online_cpus() > 1)
> > + synchronize_sched_expedited();
> > + return 0;
> > default:
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.5.2
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-25 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-24 21:57 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/5] Related non-RCU updates Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-24 21:58 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/5] module: Fix pr_fmt() bug for header use of printk Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-24 21:58 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/5] init_task: Remove redundant INIT_TASK_RCU_TREE_PREEMPT() macro Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-24 21:58 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/5] EXPERIMENTAL sched: Allow migrating kthreads into online but inactive CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-24 21:58 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-25 4:27 ` Boqun Feng
2017-07-25 16:24 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2017-07-25 13:21 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-07-25 16:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-25 16:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-25 16:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-25 16:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-25 17:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-25 18:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-25 19:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-25 20:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-25 21:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-25 21:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-25 22:39 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-07-25 22:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-07-26 0:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-26 7:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-26 15:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-26 18:01 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-07-26 18:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-26 20:37 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-07-26 21:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-27 1:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-27 12:39 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-07-27 14:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-27 10:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-27 14:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-27 8:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-27 10:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-27 10:22 ` Will Deacon
2017-07-27 13:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-25 23:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-26 7:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-26 15:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-27 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-27 13:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-27 13:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-27 14:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-27 14:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-27 14:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-27 13:55 ` Boqun Feng
2017-07-27 14:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-27 14:29 ` Boqun Feng
2017-07-27 14:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-27 14:41 ` Will Deacon
2017-07-27 14:47 ` Boqun Feng
2017-07-27 14:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-27 13:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-27 15:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-26 9:36 ` Will Deacon
2017-07-26 15:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-27 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-27 12:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-27 13:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-27 14:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-24 21:58 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/5] EXP: sched/cputime: Fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-24 22:01 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-07-24 22:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-31 22:51 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/5] Related non-RCU updates Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-31 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 1/4] module: Fix pr_fmt() bug for header use of printk Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-31 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 2/4] init_task: Remove redundant INIT_TASK_RCU_TREE_PREEMPT() macro Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-31 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 3/4] sched: Allow migrating kthreads into online but inactive CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-31 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 4/4] membarrier: Expedited private command Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170725162454.GP3730@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).