From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Neil Leeder <nleeder@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>, Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>,
Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: qcom_l2: fix column exclusion check
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:01:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170725170105.GF12749@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1500931022-21000-1-git-send-email-nleeder@codeaurora.org>
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 05:17:02PM -0400, Neil Leeder wrote:
> The check for column exclusion did not verify that the event being
> checked was an L2 event, and not a software event.
> Software events should not be checked for column exclusion.
> This resulted in a group with both software and L2 events sometimes
> incorrectly rejecting the L2 event for column exclusion and
> not counting it.
>
> Add a check for PMU type before applying column exclusion logic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Leeder <nleeder@codeaurora.org>
This looks correct, so:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Should this have:
Fixes: 21bdbb7102edeaeb ("perf: add qcom l2 cache perf events driver")
... ?
> ---
> drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c
> index c259848..b242cce 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c
> @@ -546,6 +546,7 @@ static int l2_cache_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> }
>
> if ((event != event->group_leader) &&
> + !is_software_event(event->group_leader) &&
> (L2_EVT_GROUP(event->group_leader->attr.config) ==
> L2_EVT_GROUP(event->attr.config))) {
> dev_dbg_ratelimited(&l2cache_pmu->pdev->dev,
> @@ -558,6 +559,7 @@ static int l2_cache_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> list_for_each_entry(sibling, &event->group_leader->sibling_list,
> group_entry) {
> if ((sibling != event) &&
> + !is_software_event(sibling) &&
> (L2_EVT_GROUP(sibling->attr.config) ==
> L2_EVT_GROUP(event->attr.config))) {
> dev_dbg_ratelimited(&l2cache_pmu->pdev->dev,
It's unfortunate that we duplicate the checks for the leader and
siblings, but that's not a new problem, and we can fix that in a
follow-up patch.
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-25 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-24 21:17 [PATCH] perf: qcom_l2: fix column exclusion check Neil Leeder
2017-07-25 17:01 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-07-25 19:43 ` Leeder, Neil
2017-07-26 8:27 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170725170105.GF12749@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlangsdo@redhat.com \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=nleeder@codeaurora.org \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox