From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] s390/topology: Remove the unused parent_node() macro
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:19:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170727081929.GB3744@osiris> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1501076076-1974-7-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 09:34:31PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> Commit a7be6e5a7f8d ("mm: drop useless local parameters of
> __register_one_node()") removes the last user of parent_node().
>
> The parent_node() macro in S390 platform is unnecessary.
>
> Remove it for cleanup.
>
> Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> ---
Are arch maintainers supposed to pick these patches up?
In any case: Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-27 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-26 13:34 [PATCH 00/11] Remove the parent_node() for each arch Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 01/11] arm64: numa: Remove the unused parent_node() macro Dou Liyang
2017-08-04 13:30 ` Will Deacon
2017-08-04 15:28 ` Dou Liyang
2017-08-15 13:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 02/11] ia64: topology: " Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 03/11] metag/numa: " Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 04/11] MIPS: numa: " Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 05/11] powerpc/topology: " Dou Liyang
2017-07-27 2:21 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-07-27 2:49 ` Dou Liyang
2017-08-16 11:13 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-18 12:50 ` [05/11] " Michael Ellerman
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 06/11] s390/topology: " Dou Liyang
2017-07-27 8:19 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2017-08-16 12:56 ` Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 07/11] sh/numa: " Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 08/11] sparc64/topology: " Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 16:46 ` David Miller
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 09/11] tile/topology: " Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 18:00 ` Chris Metcalf
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86/topology: " Dou Liyang
2017-07-27 8:58 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 11/11] asm-generic: numa: " Dou Liyang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170727081929.GB3744@osiris \
--to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox