From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org,
matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com,
izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com,
thgarnie@google.com, n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com,
dyoung@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] x86/boot/KASLR: Restrict kernel to be randomized in mirror regions
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 16:33:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170728083329.GL24304@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170728064614.lcntuaovomcqwxx4@gmail.com>
Hi Ingo,
On 07/28/17 at 08:46am, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > + pmap = e->efi_memmap;
> > +#else
> > + pmap = (e->efi_memmap | ((__u64)e->efi_memmap_hi << 32));
> > +#endif
> > +
> > + nr_desc = e->efi_memmap_size / e->efi_memdesc_size;
> > + for (i = 0; i < nr_desc; i++) {
> > + md = (efi_memory_desc_t *)(pmap + (i * e->efi_memdesc_size));
> > + if (md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_MORE_RELIABLE) {
> > + region.start = md->phys_addr;
> > + region.size = md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT;
> > + process_mem_region(®ion, minimum, image_size);
> > + efi_mirror_found = true;
> > +
> > + if (slot_area_index == MAX_SLOT_AREA) {
> > + debug_putstr("Aborted EFI scan (slot_areas full)!\n");
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
>
> So I suggested this before: if you treat 'md' as an array of elements (which it
> is), then the type cast can be moved to a more natural point, where we do address
> calculations anyway:
>
> md = (efi_memory_desc_t *)(e->efi_memmap | ((__u64)e->efi_memmap_hi << 32)));
>
> The 'pmap' variable can be eliminated and all places in the loop that use 'md->'
> can use 'md[i].'.
Thanks for reviewing this patch. Before when I read EFI code and found
almost all EFI codes take step of e->efi_memdesc_size long to forward to
get each EFI memmap, that's why I use it the same way here. I guess EFI
may not guarantee that each EFI memory map entry of 'efi_memory_desc_t'
occupy the whole space of e->efi_memdesc_size. In v6 post, you
questioned this, and Matt helped to confirm that EFI spec is suggesting
that way. Sorry, I trimmed the unrelated code in v6 reply, that could
make Matt's reply ignored.
Thanks
Baoquan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-28 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-26 4:00 [PATCH v7] x86/boot/KASLR: Restrict kernel to be randomized in mirror regions Baoquan He
2017-07-28 6:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-07-28 8:33 ` Baoquan He [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170728083329.GL24304@x1 \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thgarnie@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).