public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v3]: documentation,atomic: Add new documents
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 17:53:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170801165357.GC12027@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170801164200.oczql3m4f3zn6rin@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 06:42:00PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 09:14:12AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > So if ARM really needs the litmus test with smp_rmb() to be allowed,
> > we need to adjust the Linux-kernel memory model appropriately.  Which
> > means that one of us needs to reach out to the usual suspects.  Would
> > you like to do that, or would you like me to?
> 
> I'm really sad ARM8.1 LSE breaks this stuff.. It is rather counter
> intuitive (then again, we _are_ talking barriers).

I can upgrade smp_rmb to smp_mb if I have to, but I still think that
code using smp_rmb() to order an operation that doesn't return a value is
weird.

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-01 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-09  9:24 [RFC][PATCH]: documentation,atomic: Add a new atomic_t document Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-09 11:05 ` [RFC][PATCH] atomic: Fix atomic_set_release() for 'funny' architectures Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-09 11:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-09 17:28     ` Vineet Gupta
2017-06-09 18:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-09 18:58     ` James Bottomley
2017-06-09 14:03   ` Chris Metcalf
2017-08-10 12:10   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/atomic: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-09 15:44 ` [RFC][PATCH]: documentation,atomic: Add a new atomic_t document Will Deacon
2017-06-09 19:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-11 13:56     ` Boqun Feng
2017-06-12 14:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-13  6:39         ` Boqun Feng
2017-06-14 12:33         ` Will Deacon
2017-07-12 12:53         ` Boqun Feng
2017-07-12 13:08           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-12 19:13             ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-26 11:53         ` [RFC][PATCH v3]: documentation,atomic: Add new documents Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-26 12:47           ` Boqun Feng
2017-07-31  9:05             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-31 11:04               ` Boqun Feng
2017-07-31 17:43                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-01  2:14                   ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-01  9:01                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-01 10:19                     ` Will Deacon
2017-08-01 11:47                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-01 12:17                         ` Will Deacon
2017-08-01 12:52                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-01 16:14                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-01 16:42                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-01 16:53                               ` Will Deacon [this message]
2017-08-01 22:18                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-02  8:46                                 ` Will Deacon
2017-08-01 18:37                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-02  9:45                             ` Will Deacon
2017-08-02 16:17                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-03 14:05                               ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-03 14:55                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-03 16:12                                   ` Will Deacon
2017-08-03 16:58                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-01 13:35                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-26 16:28           ` Randy Dunlap
2017-06-09 18:15 ` [RFC][PATCH]: documentation,atomic: Add a new atomic_t document Randy Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170801165357.GC12027@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox