From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751722AbdHAIf7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2017 04:35:59 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53410 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751008AbdHAIf4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2017 04:35:56 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5B71422BD4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=mhiramat@kernel.org Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 17:35:50 +0900 From: Masami Hiramatsu To: Linus Walleij Cc: "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andy Shevchenko , Masahiro Yamada , Masami Hiramatsu , Jassi Brar Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] [BUGFIX] gpio: reject invalid gpio before getting gpio_desc Message-Id: <20170801173550.4e63ceaa562d8e81ecfb1a25@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <150146625669.11567.9576692487524672090.stgit@devbox> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 1 Aug 2017 10:09:09 +0200 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:57 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > Check user-given gpio number and reject it before > > calling gpio_to_desc() because gpio_to_desc() is > > for kernel driver and it expects given gpio number > > is valid (means 0 to 511). > > If given number is invalid, gpio_to_desc() calls > > WARN() and dump registers and stack for debug. > > This means user can easily kick WARN() just by > > writing invalid gpio number (e.g. 512) to > > /sys/class/gpio/export. > > > > Fixes: 0e9a5edf5d01 ("gpio: fix deferred probe detection for legacy API") > > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu > > --- > > Changes in v2: > > - Add gpio_to_valid_desc() according to Andy's comment (Thanks!). > > - Fix patch description. > > I hate the old sysfs ABI sigh. Thanks for fixing it anyways! > > Should this be tagged for stable? Yes, I think so. Since this has been introduced 3 years ago, it would be nice to go to older stable trees too. Thanks, > > Waiting for Andy's review before applying. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij -- Masami Hiramatsu