Re: [RFC 0/5] Add I3C subsystem

Wolfram Sang
2017-07-31T20:47:06Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 555 bytes --]

> > I agree this is the least invasive and also the most compatible
> > approach. The other solution would probably be to have some kind of
> > emulation layer?
>
> Could you detail a bit more what you mean by "emulation layer"?

Not really. That was more a extremly high level approach of what
theoretically could be possible. When I try to think about details, it
gets pretty invasive.

> > Since the spec is not public, details about the protocol will be
> > especially useful, I'd say.
>
> Okay, I'll see what I can do.

Thanks.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]