Re: [RFC 2/5] i3c: Add core I3C infrastructure

Wolfram Sang
2017-08-01T17:27:08Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 530 bytes --]

> I'm surprised they didn't allow for slave clock stretching when
> communicating with a legacy i2c device, it will prohibit use of a rather
> large class of devices. :(

Yes, but I3C is push/pull IIRC.

> As for interrupts you are always free to wire up an out-of-band
> interrupt like before. :)

Yes, my wording was a bit too strong. It is possible, sure. Yet, I
understood that one of the features of I3C is to have in-band interrupt
support. We will see if the demand for backward compatibility or "saving
pins" is higher.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]